2021
DOI: 10.1590/0034-737x202168010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and physiological quality of rice seeds in function of drying temperature and storage

Abstract: The objective with the work was to evaluate, during storage, the rice seeds physical and physiological quality, cultivar IRGA 424 RI, dried with different drying air temperatures. For such, rice seeds were harvested with a moisture content of 22%. Then, they were subjected to drying in a cross-flow dryer, operating in an intermittent system and using the 55 and 65 ºC drying air temperatures. After, samples containing 50 kg of seeds were stored in PP Woven Bags for 240 days. After drying and every 60 days, phys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physiological results of high drying rates are shown by the reduced germination and germination speed (OBA et al, 2019); increased seedling abnormality rate (HARTMANN FILHO et al, 2016); and decreased conservation potential during storage; however, these losses may not show immediately. The physiological quality of seeds during storage can reduce significantly, as found for rice (SCARIOT et al, 2021), sunflower (HUANG et al, 2021, corn (VERGARA et al, 2018), andsafflower (OBA et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The physiological results of high drying rates are shown by the reduced germination and germination speed (OBA et al, 2019); increased seedling abnormality rate (HARTMANN FILHO et al, 2016); and decreased conservation potential during storage; however, these losses may not show immediately. The physiological quality of seeds during storage can reduce significantly, as found for rice (SCARIOT et al, 2021), sunflower (HUANG et al, 2021, corn (VERGARA et al, 2018), andsafflower (OBA et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%