2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Numerical Modeling of Submerged Vegetation Roughness in Rivers and Flood Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth specifying how the assumption of a lower slope angle (e.g. 10°) would not be a realistic hypothesis for the stone‐wall bench‐terraces of the reference condition (Figure d). Manning's n roughness is uniformly distributed on the DTM and assigned a value of n = 0·125 in the typical range of the overland flow (Fathi‐Moghadam et al ., ); Surface‐water detention equal to 1 mm.…”
Section: Methods and Assumptions For Bench‐terrace Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth specifying how the assumption of a lower slope angle (e.g. 10°) would not be a realistic hypothesis for the stone‐wall bench‐terraces of the reference condition (Figure d). Manning's n roughness is uniformly distributed on the DTM and assigned a value of n = 0·125 in the typical range of the overland flow (Fathi‐Moghadam et al ., ); Surface‐water detention equal to 1 mm.…”
Section: Methods and Assumptions For Bench‐terrace Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some research groups have studied the effect of submergence ratio with single height vegetation (e.g. Ghisalberti and Nepf, 2002;Järvelä, 2005;Fathi-Moghadam et al, 2011), a more dynamic approach, allowing for exploration of time-dependent submergence ratio, is still lacking.…”
Section: Patch Submergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghisalberti and Nepf, ; Järvelä, ; Fathi‐Moghadam et al. ), a more dynamic approach, allowing for exploration of time‐dependent submergence ratio, is still lacking.…”
Section: Characterization Of Vegetation Flow and Their Interactions mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asimismo, se demuestra el efecto hidrodinámico de la vegetación a medida que se incrementa el flujo, aunque esta tendencia es muy variable según el tipo de especie y condiciones hidráulicas (Järvelä, 2002;Nikora et al, 2008). En este aspecto Fathi-Moghadam et al (2011), Fathi-Moghadam y Drikvandi (2012) y Green (2005b), entre otros, observaron que existe una relación no-lineal entre la resistencia al flujo de la vegetación y las características del flujo (velocidad, calado, ancho, etc. ), aplicable también a macrófitos (Dawson y Robinson, 1984).…”
Section: Caracterización Del Coeficiente De Rugosidadunclassified