2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeography in Nassarius mud snails: Complex patterns in congeneric species

Abstract: One major goal for phylogeographical studies is to elucidate respective roles of multiple evolutionary and ecological forces that shape the current distribution patterns. In marine and coastal ecosystems, it has been generated a common realization that species with enormous population size and pelagic larval stages can disperse across broad geographical scales, leading to weak or even no phylogeographical structure across large geographical scales. However, the violation of such realization has been frequently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…conoidalis and N . nodifer has never been revealed in previous studies (Chen & Zhang, ; Pu et al, ; Zou et al, ). All these phylogenies, each based on short gene fragments, were poorly supported, often contradicting each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…conoidalis and N . nodifer has never been revealed in previous studies (Chen & Zhang, ; Pu et al, ; Zou et al, ). All these phylogenies, each based on short gene fragments, were poorly supported, often contradicting each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Within Nassarius , the use of subgenus is quite common in taxonomic description. However, previous molecular analyses did not find support to maintain the current use of subgenera due to the homoplastic of shell or radula characters, which are usually used to define subgenera (Galindo et al, ; Pu et al, ). In the present study, the monophyly of subgenus Zeuxis , which was represented by three species, was not supported, corresponding with previous molecular phylogenies using short gene fragments, including COI, 16S and/or ITS (Chen & Zhang, ; Li et al, ; Pu et al, ; Zou, Li, & Kong, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After Galindo et al (2016) around 60 species were reclassified into genera other than Nassarius but more than 300 species remained tentatively in this genus (MolluscaBase, 2020b) awaiting further phylogenetic studies. In this regard, two subsequent mitogenomic studies that focused on the genus Nassarius improved the resolution of phylogenetic relationships among species restricted to the China seas (Yang, Li, Kong, & Yu, 2019;Yang et al, 2020), compared with previous attempts based on partial gene sequences (e.g., Zhang & You, 2009;Chen & Zhang, 2012;Pu et al, 2017). As a result of these mitogenomic studies, the composition of the genus Nassarius was refined, with Nassarius jacksonianus and Nassarius sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, two subsequent mitogenomic studies that focussed on the genus Nassarius improved the resolution of phylogenetic relationships among species restricted to the China seas (Yang et al., 2019, 2020), compared with previous attempts based on partial gene sequences (e.g. Chen & Zhang, 2012; Pu et al., 2017; Zhang & You, 2009). As a result of these mitogenomic studies, the composition of the genus Nassarius was refined, with Nassarius jacksonianus and Nassarius sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a sequence deposited as N. hepaticus (Pulteney, 1799) (FJ660644.1) in GenBank was also assigned to this group. However, since the other sequences of this species were assigned in a distant clade with N. nodifer (Powys, 1835) (see Appendices session for the entire phylogeny), this sequence probably represents an error of identification (as both species have similar shells) or even introgression between N. hepaticus and N. foveolatus, process already proposed for other Nassarius species (for details, see Pu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%