2018
DOI: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Artemisia L. Species from Kazakhstan Based on Matk Analyses

Abstract: The genus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work is part of a national program aiming to evaluate the genetic variation in the wild flora of Kazakhstan [28]. The project, along with DNA barcoding analyses of wild plant species [29][30][31][32], is also incorporating studies using simple sequence repeats (SSR) [33], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [34], and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) [35] markers in a collaboration between local botanists and geneticists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is part of a national program aiming to evaluate the genetic variation in the wild flora of Kazakhstan [28]. The project, along with DNA barcoding analyses of wild plant species [29][30][31][32], is also incorporating studies using simple sequence repeats (SSR) [33], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [34], and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) [35] markers in a collaboration between local botanists and geneticists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the taxonomic identification of Artemisia species has relied on morphological characteristics. However, controversies with regards to the taxonomic relationships have arisen due to the plastic nature, complex genetics, and polyploidy of Artemisia species, limiting the role of morphological characteristics as the sole factor for classification [29,30]. The development of high-resolution genetic markers is important for fostering attempts regarding species identification, inferring phylogeny, and improving the medicinal value of A. scoparia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, because of the number of species, diverse morphological types, ploidy, and complicated genetic relationships of Artemisia , the taxonomic relationships of the genus are controversial and based only on morphological traits, such as the capitula type and floret fertility[19, 20]. As a result, considering the conserved structural and relatively compact gene density, chloroplast genomic materials are widely used in genomic evolution studies, molecular marker development, and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Artemisia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, considering the conserved structural and relatively compact gene density, chloroplast genomic materials are widely used in genomic evolution studies, molecular marker development, and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Artemisia . Many researchers have used single gene data ( matK , ndhF , rps11 ), IGS data ( psbA _ trnH , trnS _ trnC , trnS _ trnfM , trnL _ trnF ), and shared protein-coding gene data of Artemisia to perform phylogenetic analysis [1927]. However, the cp genomic data of Artemisia are still quite limited and data for only a few species have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%