1989
DOI: 10.2307/1222636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Studies in Centrospermae: A Brief Appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-The Caryophyllales (or Centrospermae) consist ofapproximately 11 core families. Although the delimitation of some families is uncertain and their phylogenetic relationships are a contentious issue, it is accepted widely that the order is monophyletic (Ehrendorfer, 1976;Mabry, 1977;Rodman et al, 1984;Hershkovitz, 1989). The occurrence of PIli-type sieve element plastids and bound ferulic acids in unlignified cell walls unites the members of the order.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-The Caryophyllales (or Centrospermae) consist ofapproximately 11 core families. Although the delimitation of some families is uncertain and their phylogenetic relationships are a contentious issue, it is accepted widely that the order is monophyletic (Ehrendorfer, 1976;Mabry, 1977;Rodman et al, 1984;Hershkovitz, 1989). The occurrence of PIli-type sieve element plastids and bound ferulic acids in unlignified cell walls unites the members of the order.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, a derived sister group of the Caryophyllineae, contained three clades, the basal "cohort Nyctaginares" iNyctaginaceae and Phytolaccaceae), the intermediate "cohort Amaranthares" (Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae), and the derived "cohort Portu1acares" (Aizoaceae, Cactaceae, Portulacaceae, Basellaceae, and Didiereaeeae). This analysis was criticized (Levin, 1985;Bittrich & Hartmann 1988;Hershkovitz, 1989)for incorrect assessment of homology, binary coding of multistate characters, variability within terminal taxa and polarity assessment. While Rodman (1985Rodman ( , 1990responded to these criticisms and modified the treatment somewhat, the phylogenetic interpretation remains essentially unchanged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generic composition of Phytolaccaceae, for example, has undergone a continuous thinning, with the recognition of Stegnospermataceae, Achatocarpaceae (as in APG, 1998), and sometimes also Petiveriaceae, Agdestidaceae, Gisekiaceae, and Barbeuiaceae (Nakai, 1942) as separate families. A morphological phylogenetic analysis of the order by Rodman et al (1984) was criticized by Hershkovitz (1989), who wrote that because of several problems (mainly choice of outgroup, def-inition of taxonomic units, and polymorphic characters within units) the results were less satisfactory than Cronquist's classification (1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%