Phylogenetic relationships within the Mysidae (Crustacea, Peracarida, Mysida) based on nuclear 18S ribosomal RNA sequences

Remerie, Thomas; Bulckaen, Bart; Calderón, Julio A. Acosta; Deprez, T.; Mees, Jan; Vanfleteren, Jacques R.; Vanreusel, Ann; Vierstraete, Andy; Vincx, Magda; Wittmann, Karl J.; Wooldridge, T.

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.03.007

Cited by 12 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relative placement of the subfamily Gastrosaccinae is in agreement with results presented by Remerie et al (2004). The Gastrosaccinae are deWned by the Wrst abdominal somite of the female having the pleural plates developed into a pair of lateral lamellae that take part in the formation of the brood pouch.…”

Section: Gastrosaccinaesupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The "Holmesimysis + Alienacanthomysis + Neomysis", deWned by only having the fourth male pleopod developed as biramous; a "Taphromysis + Limnomysis + Diamysis" group, which constitutes brackish to freshwater species; and a third group containing "Paramesodopsis + Hemimysis+ Praunus+ Mysis+Schistomysis". These groups are in close agreement with Remerie et al (2004), but we do not Wnd the polyphyly reXected in their groups Mysini-A and Mysini-B. This being said, our MP analyses fail to construct a monophyly of these three groups, and ML suggests the Mysini as paraphyletic, placing the "Holmesimysis + Alienacanthomysis + Neomysis" group basal to a "Mysini + Leptomysini" group.…”

Section: Mysinae and Mysidellinaesupporting

confidence: 53%

“…However, these genera, as well as Haplostylus and Eurobowmaniella, have biramous pleopods, while in Anchialina the female pleopods are uniramous. Our analyses present additional support for a "Gastrosaccus group" deWned by the biramous female Wrst pleopod and biramous male pleopods (Remerie et al, 2004), but the results give limited support for internal relationships within this group.…”

Section: Gastrosaccinaementioning

confidence: 54%

“…The group is consistently supported as a strong clade in our 18S rRNA phylogenies. Remerie et al (2004) emphasized the development of male and female Wrst pleopods for classifying the Gastrosaccinae, proposing a biramous state ancestral to uniramous. They erroneously stated that females of the genera Bowmaniella, Archaeomysis, and Gastrosaccus have uniramous Wrst pleopods (Remerie personal communication).…”

Section: Gastrosaccinaementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although both De JongMoreau and Casanova dealt with aspects of character evolution of internal morphology, foregut characters were never used in formalized phylogenetic analyses of Lophogastrida and Mysida. A most recent molecular study based on 18S rRNA for selected taxa of the family Mysidae present evidence of non-monophyletic assemblages of Mysidae subfamilies and tribes (Remerie et al, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The disunity of “Mysidacea” (Crustacea)

Meland

Willassen

2007

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New studies on malacostracan relationships have drawn attention to issues concerning monophyly of the order Mysidacea, manifested in recent crustacean classiWcations that treat the taxon as two separate orders, Lophogastrida and Mysida. We present molecular phylogenies of these orders based on complete sequences of nuclear small-subunit ribosomal DNA (18S rRNA), and morphological evidence is used to revise the classiWcation of the order Mysida to better reXect evolutionary history.A secondary structure model for 18S rRNA was constructed and used to assign putative stem and loop regions to two groups of partitions for phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenies were estimated by maximum-likelihood, Bayesian inference, and maximum-parsimony. The analyses gave strong support for three independently derived lineages, represented by three monophyletic groups, Lophogastrida, Stygiomysida, and Mysida. The family Petalophthalmidae is considered as sister group to the family Mysidae, and Boreomysinae and Rhopalophthalminae are the most early derived of the Mysidae. The tribes contained in the current classiWcation of the subfamily Mysinae are not well-supported by either molecular data or morphology.

show abstract

Section: Gastrosaccinaesupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Mysinae and Mysidellinaesupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Gastrosaccinaementioning

confidence: 54%

Section: Gastrosaccinaementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The disunity of “Mysidacea” (Crustacea)

Meland

Willassen

2007

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mysid crustaceans as standard models for the screening and testing of endocrine-disrupting chemicals

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigative efforts into the potential endocrine-disrupting effects of chemicals have mainly concentrated on vertebrates, with significantly less attention paid to understanding potential endocrine disruption in the invertebrates. Given that invertebrates account for at least 95% of all known animal species and are critical to ecosystem structure and function, it remains essential to close this gap in knowledge and research. The lack of progress regarding endocrine disruption in invertebrates is still largely due to: (1) our ignorance of mode-of-action, physiological control, and hormone structure and function in invertebrates; (2) lack of a standardized invertebrate assay; (3) the irrelevance to most invertebrates of the proposed activity-based biological indicators for endocrine disruptor exposure (androgen, estrogen and thyroid); (4) limited field studies. Past and ongoing research efforts using the standard invertebrate toxicity test model, the mysid shrimp, have aimed at addressing some of these issues. The present review serves as an update to a previous publication on the use of mysid shrimp for the evaluation of endocrine disruptors (Verslycke et al., 2004a). It summarizes recent investigative efforts that have significantly advanced our understanding of invertebrate-specific endocrine toxicity, population modeling, field studies, and transgeneration standard test development using the mysid model.

show abstract

Testing species boundaries in the Antrodiaetus unicolor complex (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Antrodiaetidae): “Paraphyly” and cryptic diversity

Hendrixson

Bond

2005

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phylogenetic relationships within the Mysidae (Crustacea, Peracarida, Mysida) based on nuclear 18S ribosomal RNA sequences

Cited by 12 publications

References 19 publications

The disunity of “Mysidacea” (Crustacea)

The disunity of “Mysidacea” (Crustacea)

Mysid crustaceans as standard models for the screening and testing of endocrine-disrupting chemicals

Testing species boundaries in the Antrodiaetus unicolor complex (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Antrodiaetidae): “Paraphyly” and cryptic diversity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About