1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00150.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships of the Pomacanthidae (Pisces: Teleostei) inferred from allozyme variation

Abstract: Phylogenetic relationships of 31 pomacanthid species representing all genera were investigated by horizontal starch gel electrophoresis. Nei's genetic distances (D) were calculated and dendrograms constructed from allozyme variation in 23 loci. The average D value was 0.03 between conspeci®c colour variants, 0.40 between congeneric subgenera, and 1.27 between confamilial genera. From the dendrograms the following were revealed: (1) the generic status of Apolemichthys arcuatus and Holacanthus venustus, as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, faced to species diversity of the genus Centropyge, high genetic diversity (Chung & Woo, 1998) and the scarcity of cytogenetical information, it seems inappropriate to assume that conserved chromosomal features are characteristic for this Pomacanthidae group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, faced to species diversity of the genus Centropyge, high genetic diversity (Chung & Woo, 1998) and the scarcity of cytogenetical information, it seems inappropriate to assume that conserved chromosomal features are characteristic for this Pomacanthidae group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, karyotypes with 2n = 48 chromosomes had variably sized NOR-bearing chromosomes. In addition, the phylogenetic relationships suggested by Chung & Woo (1998) support the occurrence of a single event. Chung & Woo (1998) reported phylogenetic relationships of Pomacanthidae, which they had inferred from allozyme variation; they analyzed all the species that were examined in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In addition, the phylogenetic relationships suggested by Chung & Woo (1998) support the occurrence of a single event. Chung & Woo (1998) reported phylogenetic relationships of Pomacanthidae, which they had inferred from allozyme variation; they analyzed all the species that were examined in this study. Therefore, based on this phylogenetic relationship, we can discuss a more detailed scenario for chromosomal evolution in Centropyge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We follow the taxonomy of [32], who rejected the subgenus Pomacanthus [Pomacanthodes] , leading us to provisionally adopt suggestions from [35] regarding the sub-generic classification of Pomacanthus (for alternative views, see [36]). The species Paracentropyge multifasciata was too shy for video filming, and Pomacanthus imperator , the sole GBR representative of Pomacanthus [Acanthochaetodon] Bleeker 1876 could not be obtained live for filming.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%