2012
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2010.511752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Relationship of Cultured and WildLabeo rohitaandCirrhinus mrigalaBased on Muscles Proteins Profile in Different Weight Groups: A New Tool in Phylogenetic Analysis

Abstract: Genetic heterogeneity and polymorphism in muscle proteins present in the meat of wild and cultured Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus mrigala was performed using SDS-PAGE. Cultured L. rohita and C. mrigala possessed more proteins than those in the wild ones and were dependent on their weight. Un-weighed pair group method with arithmetic average cluster analysis delineated a 50% linkage distance. Fish weight dissimilarity coefficient ranged from 1.73 to 3.87 in eight clusters at 75% linkage distance. The overall groupi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Mabrur et al (2018), the geographical origin of Channa striata has resulted some changes in protein profile of the fish, which was shown by the number of protein bands. The study of Mahboob et al (2012), the wild and cultured L. rohita and C. mrigala has shown variation on the protein profiles. Water pollution, including heavy metal contamination, industrial wastewater, and pesticide used has resulted some changes in protein expression of the fish for adaptation due to the condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Mabrur et al (2018), the geographical origin of Channa striata has resulted some changes in protein profile of the fish, which was shown by the number of protein bands. The study of Mahboob et al (2012), the wild and cultured L. rohita and C. mrigala has shown variation on the protein profiles. Water pollution, including heavy metal contamination, industrial wastewater, and pesticide used has resulted some changes in protein expression of the fish for adaptation due to the condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information obtained by protein separation based on their molecular weight using SDS-PAGE technique (Roy and Kumar 2012). Protein profiles have been used as markers for genetic diversity assessment of the freshwater fish, including snapper fish (Lutjanidae) (Velamala et al 2017), snakehead (Channidae) (Haniffa et al 2017), Oreochromis niloticus (Elghobashy et al 2005), Carp (Saxena and Soranganba 2014), Lethrinus borbonicus, Siganus rivulatus and Mulloidichthys flavolineatus (Ebied et al 2014), and Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus mrigala (Mahboob et al 2012). Therefore, this study proposed to access genetic diversity of Anabantoidei fish collected from South Kalimantan based on protein profiles obtained from SDS-PAGE analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%