“…We refrained from describing a new genus because of the following points: (a) both subantarctic species recently described by Gremmen (2001, 2006) in the genus, both assumed not to genuinely belonging to Arctomia s. str. and with generic affinities "under study", should be further studied; indeed, several characters put them aside of the genus such as a pluricellular cortex; the description of a new genus within such a small family as the Arctomiaceae is premature in that context; (b) ascomata and conidiomata are unknown, or not yet discovered, in A. borbonica and thus our dataset lacks important characters (Lumbsch et al 2005, Table 2); (c) morphological and anatomical characters may be very much misleading for phylogenetic reconstruction and sound generic delimitations as demonstrated by many studies in lichenized or unlichenized ascomycetes (Gaya et al 2008, Lantz et al 2011, Prieto et al 2012, Sérusiaux et al 2010; and (d) two statistical topology tests applied to the likelihood tree gave opposite results to assess the monophyly of Arctomia when including all species studied, e.g. A.…”