2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0837-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PhyInformR: phylogenetic experimental design and phylogenomic data exploration in R

Abstract: BackgroundAnalyses of phylogenetic informativeness represent an important step in screening potential or existing datasets for their proclivity toward convergent or parallel evolution of molecular sites. However, while new theory has been developed from which to predict the utility of sequence data, adoption of these advances have been stymied by a lack of software enabling application of advances in theory, especially for large next-generation sequence data sets. Moreover, there are no theoretical barriers to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are all common problems in super‐matrix approaches, and they can be exacerbated in studies that focus on a regional species pool (Betancur‐R, Li, et al, ; Heath et al, ; Phillippe et al, ). Although current developments in phylogenetics and phylogenomics do attempt to address these issues (Betancur‐R, Li, et al, ; Dornburg, Fisk, Tamagnan, & Townsend, ; Dornburg et al, ; Simion et al, ), there is still no consensus approach (Phillippe et al, ), especially when attempting to resolve both recent and deep phylogenetic relationships. Our novel approach facilitates using topological constraints based on previous phylogenetic studies, yet still allows unconstrained taxa to vary according to their molecular affinities and helps position taxa without sequence information within defined taxonomic constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are all common problems in super‐matrix approaches, and they can be exacerbated in studies that focus on a regional species pool (Betancur‐R, Li, et al, ; Heath et al, ; Phillippe et al, ). Although current developments in phylogenetics and phylogenomics do attempt to address these issues (Betancur‐R, Li, et al, ; Dornburg, Fisk, Tamagnan, & Townsend, ; Dornburg et al, ; Simion et al, ), there is still no consensus approach (Phillippe et al, ), especially when attempting to resolve both recent and deep phylogenetic relationships. Our novel approach facilitates using topological constraints based on previous phylogenetic studies, yet still allows unconstrained taxa to vary according to their molecular affinities and helps position taxa without sequence information within defined taxonomic constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are all common problems in supermatrix approaches, and they can be exacerbated in studies that focus on a regional species pool Heath et al, 2008;Phillippe et al, 2011). Although current developments in phylogenetics and phylogenomics do attempt to address these issues Dornburg, Fisk, Tamagnan, & (Rangel et al, 2015). Phylogenies represent hypothetical evolutionary relationships among taxa that ultimately depend on taxonomic sampling, the nature and extent of available genetic information, a host of particular model assumptions, and the strength of genuine underlying biological signals (Heath et al, 2008;Phillipe et al, 2011;Rangel et al, 2015).…”
Section: New Phylogenetic Tools To Build a Regional Phylogeny In Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to rely on robust gene trees when estimating species trees with summary methods, particularly when attempting to reconstruct ancient relationships or rapid diversifications (Salichos and Rokas 2013). Recently, a number of studies have been published Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syy085/5232148 by Bukkyo University user on 06 December 2018 addressing the impact of systematic errors (Meiklejohn et al 2016;Arcila et al 2017), the number of loci and their phylogenetic information content (Gilbert et al 2015;Dornburg et al 2016;Blom et al 2017), and different data filtering strategies (Doyle et al 2015;Hosner et al 2016;Gilbert et al 2018;Molloy and Warnow 2018) on gene tree-species tree congruence and phylogenetic reliability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessments of other phylogenetic assumptions require other types of tests and surveys. Some of these relevant questions and methods are listed in Table 2 (50,122-145).…”
Section: The New Phylogenetic Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%