2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phthalate exposure in pregnant women and newborns – The urinary metabolite excretion pattern differs distinctly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
32
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since for DEHP it was possible to analyze primary metabolite (MEHP -the first step of DEHP metabolism pathway) and 2 secondary metabolites representing further steps of its metabolism (i.e., hydroxyl and oxo MEHP -the 2nd and the 3rd step), it was possible to identify the extent (progress) of DEHP metabolism. Thus, we calculated the ratio of the 2nd to the 1st step as 59.8 and the 3rd to the 2nd step as 5.7, which are much higher values than those calculated by Enke et al (2013) (2.4 and 0.9, respectively) [30]. The explanation of this observation is that the time period between exposure to phthalates and urine sampling for the analysis was longer in our study than in the study by Enke et al (2013) [30].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since for DEHP it was possible to analyze primary metabolite (MEHP -the first step of DEHP metabolism pathway) and 2 secondary metabolites representing further steps of its metabolism (i.e., hydroxyl and oxo MEHP -the 2nd and the 3rd step), it was possible to identify the extent (progress) of DEHP metabolism. Thus, we calculated the ratio of the 2nd to the 1st step as 59.8 and the 3rd to the 2nd step as 5.7, which are much higher values than those calculated by Enke et al (2013) (2.4 and 0.9, respectively) [30]. The explanation of this observation is that the time period between exposure to phthalates and urine sampling for the analysis was longer in our study than in the study by Enke et al (2013) [30].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Thus, we calculated the ratio of the 2nd to the 1st step as 59.8 and the 3rd to the 2nd step as 5.7, which are much higher values than those calculated by Enke et al (2013) (2.4 and 0.9, respectively) [30]. The explanation of this observation is that the time period between exposure to phthalates and urine sampling for the analysis was longer in our study than in the study by Enke et al (2013) [30]. Nevertheless, we assessed the total daily intake of DEHP and DEP applying calculation…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these concerns, data on phthalate exposure levels during this period of life are sparse (Adibi et al 2008; Enke et al 2013; Sathyanarayana et al 2008a, 2008b). Some studies have reported extremely high exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) during hospitalization in preterm children (Silva et al 2006; Su et al 2012; Weuve et al 2006), suggesting a risk of adverse health effects in this group as gonadal development is not completed (Rey and Josso 2013) and detoxification processes are still immature (Coughtrie et al 1988; Tan et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breastfed children also ingest phthalates with the mother's milk [32]. Phthalates were identified in urine samples from newborns, which indicates that the analyzed compounds easily cross the placental barrier and pose a threat to unborn children [33]. The available reference literature contains relatively few publications dealing with this problem.…”
Section: The Influence Of Phthalates On Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%