2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(99)00138-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetic response of Japanese rose species Rosa bracteata and Rosa rugosa to temperature and light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This physiological variable remained constant throughout the curve ( Figure 4C and D), with values around 0.10 mol H 2 O m −2 s −1 . This can be partly explained as a result of the center of origin of coffee and its adaptation to several environments, such as the physiological adaptations that can reduce respiratory rate and maximize carbon intake (Kitajima 1994, Ueda et al 2000, Boardman 1977.…”
Section: Stomatal Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This physiological variable remained constant throughout the curve ( Figure 4C and D), with values around 0.10 mol H 2 O m −2 s −1 . This can be partly explained as a result of the center of origin of coffee and its adaptation to several environments, such as the physiological adaptations that can reduce respiratory rate and maximize carbon intake (Kitajima 1994, Ueda et al 2000, Boardman 1977.…”
Section: Stomatal Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was expected because of the plant's adaptive characteristics (Kitajima 1994, Ueda et al 2000, Boardman 1977) and because stomatal conductance was constant. In this case, the values found were 1.0 to 1.1 mmol H 2 Om −2 s −1 (Figure 5C and D).…”
Section: Leaf Transpirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this species, bud outgrowth is inhibited within a few hours of dark exposure in rose plants first grown under white light (WL) and, thus, rich in sugars. Yet, as low an intensity of WL as 2 mmol m 22 s 21 , which is far below the light compensation point of rose plants (40-70 mmol m 22 s 21 , according to Zieslin and Tsujita, 1990;Ueda et al, 2000), is sufficient to trigger their outgrowth (Girault et al, 2008). This suggests that, in rose plants too, the triggering of bud outgrowth requires a light signal that is different from the energy supply involved in photosynthetic assimilation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…•s −1 in rose plants (Rosa rugosa) [24]. Furthermore, [25] indicated that using a light intensity of 180.7 μmol•m −2…”
Section: Optimization Of Light Intensity For Maximum Photosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First red and Twing) increased chlorophyll content. Moreover, [24] showed that increasing light intensity and sun light increased the chlorophyll content for rose plants (Rosa rugosa). Recently, [20] showed that chlorophyll content increased with increasing the light on marigold plants, and for Ficus banjamina L. [38].…”
Section: Effect Of Different Sampling Times On Chlorophyll Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%