2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosensitization in naïve sheep grazing signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens) under full sunlight or a silvopastoral system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content of protodioscin-the main saponin associated with intoxication and used as an indicator of photosensitization in animals (Lelis et al, 2018)-in the cultivars was low when compared with those described in studies with cultivars of the genus Brachiaria (Faccin et al, 2014;Porto et al, 2013;Leal et al, 2016Leal et al, , 2020. In Brachiaria spp., Melo et al (2018) found that protodioscin levels between 3 and 13 g/kg DM caused intoxication in lactating lambs.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The content of protodioscin-the main saponin associated with intoxication and used as an indicator of photosensitization in animals (Lelis et al, 2018)-in the cultivars was low when compared with those described in studies with cultivars of the genus Brachiaria (Faccin et al, 2014;Porto et al, 2013;Leal et al, 2016Leal et al, , 2020. In Brachiaria spp., Melo et al (2018) found that protodioscin levels between 3 and 13 g/kg DM caused intoxication in lactating lambs.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…B. decumbens intoxication causing liver dysfunction leads to an elevation in the concentration of liver enzymes ( Muniandy Chung, Jaapar, et al . 2021 ), alteration in liver metabolism, thereby resulting in weight loss in 70% of studied animals ( Lelis et al . 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in studies of the toxicity and must include botanical identification and separately chemical species analysis. Melo et al (2018) Every 28 days, randomly, with a 0.25m² square 0.3-1.3% Melo et al (2019a) Metallic square in 10 random points, simulating grazing 0.42-1.81% Melo et al (2019b) Ten samples every 28 days, with 0.5x0.5m square, close to the ground 1,04-2.17% Brum et al (2007) B. decumbens Cuts close to the ground, at 20 points 1.63-2.36% Brum et al (2009) At four different stages, cuts at 3cm from the soil b 0.8-1.,9% De Oliveira et al (2013) Harvest by hand, simulating grazing at random points 3.24-3.54% Porto et al (2013) Every 15 days, 2cm cuts of soil, 10 random locations 0.94% Gracindo et al (2014) Every 15 days, 2cm cuts from the ground in 10 points with 1m² 0.33-1.22% Lozano et al (2017) Collection at three points of 1m², simulating grazing 0.59-2.99% Castro et al (2018) Air-dried samples every 15 days 0.62-1.18% Lelis et al (2018) Six samples every 28 days with a 0.25m² metal square, cut at 5cm from the ground 0.9-0.37% Present study…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%