2019
DOI: 10.31635/ccschem.019.20180033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoresponsive Biomimetic Protocells for Near-Infrared-Light-Regulated Phototheranostics

Abstract: Nature has created complex living systems with outstanding structure and remarkable function. Constructing biomimetic systems that rival living organisms has attracted considerable research interest in research fields of self-assembly and bionic science. Inspired by the composition of photosynthetic bacteria, we have designed artificial photoresponsive protocells through capsulation of upconversion nanoparticles@black phosphorus quantum dots (UCNPs@BPQDs) within aptamer-modified liposome (Apt-Lip) to form UCNP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) = 6 0 6 0 + 6 where r is the distance between UCNP interior emitter Er 3+ (donor) and Cy3 labelled on DNA strand (acceptor), and R 0 denotes the Förster distance of donor−acceptor pair, which is calculated to be 3.5 nm with the fluorescence decay of UCNP-DNA-Cy3@1-20, close to those reported previously [23][24][25][26] . UCNP-DNA-Cy3@1 demonstrated the energy transfer efficiency of 60.1%, while the energy transfer efficiency for UCNP-DNA-Cy3@5 was below 30%, and UCNP-DNA-Cy3@15 and @20 showed rarely photon transfer, consistent with the appearance of fluorescence intensity and lifetime (Figure 2C and Supporting Information Figure S3B).…”
Section: Distance Dependent Upconversion Energy Transfer Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) = 6 0 6 0 + 6 where r is the distance between UCNP interior emitter Er 3+ (donor) and Cy3 labelled on DNA strand (acceptor), and R 0 denotes the Förster distance of donor−acceptor pair, which is calculated to be 3.5 nm with the fluorescence decay of UCNP-DNA-Cy3@1-20, close to those reported previously [23][24][25][26] . UCNP-DNA-Cy3@1 demonstrated the energy transfer efficiency of 60.1%, while the energy transfer efficiency for UCNP-DNA-Cy3@5 was below 30%, and UCNP-DNA-Cy3@15 and @20 showed rarely photon transfer, consistent with the appearance of fluorescence intensity and lifetime (Figure 2C and Supporting Information Figure S3B).…”
Section: Distance Dependent Upconversion Energy Transfer Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The multiplex upconversion emissions and relatively low background make upconversion nanoparticle (UCNP) a popular nanomaterial for designing bioprobes in bioanalysis and cancer therapy recently [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Taking UCNP as energy donor and dye attached on its surface as energy acceptor, different "off-on" upconversion bioprobes have been designed for sensing of small molecules such as metal ions 7,8 , ATP 9 , free radicals 10,11 , pH 12,13 , sulfur compounds 14 , and drug metabolites 15,16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 113 ] For instance, the nucleolin‐specific aptamer AS1411, a G‐rich DNA oligonucleotide, was modified on the surface of the liposome UCNPs@BPQDs@Apt‐Lip (UBAL), that encapsulated upconversion nanoparticles@black phosphorus quantum dots (UCNPs@BPQDs). [ 114 ] The aptamer‐modified liposome guided the tumor cell‐targeted combined therapies of PTT and PDT.…”
Section: Construction Of Liposomal Systems For Pdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Such an O 2 -irrelevant PDT-like therapy can overcome tumor hypoxia and greatly improve therapeutic efficacy against tumors. However, most studies have used photothermal agents with excitation in the NIR-I region (650-950 nm), [20][21][22][23][24][25] which may have low maximum permissible exposure (MPE; e.g., 0.33 W cm −2 at 808 nm) and insufficient tissue penetration depth. 26 Considering that NIR-II light (1000-1700 nm) has less tissue scattering, greater penetration depth, and higher MPE (e.g., 1 W/cm 2 at 1064 nm) than NIR-I light, 27,28 combined therapy that allows for excitation by NIR-II light to produce heat and tumor O 2 -independent free radicals may be preferable in treating deep-seated hypoxic tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%