2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photopolymerization and photostructuring of molecularly imprinted polymers for sensor applications—A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
123
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structuring MIPs at the micro-and nano-scale increases the recognition surface available, greatly improving the site accessibility of imprinted materials. 2 Implementation of MIP-based nanosensor architectures requires the formation of MIP micro-and nanofeatures with well-dened morphologies onto the surface of particular devices (e.g. transducers) and/or planar substrates (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structuring MIPs at the micro-and nano-scale increases the recognition surface available, greatly improving the site accessibility of imprinted materials. 2 Implementation of MIP-based nanosensor architectures requires the formation of MIP micro-and nanofeatures with well-dened morphologies onto the surface of particular devices (e.g. transducers) and/or planar substrates (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIPs have been most often synthesized on the sensor surface in situ in the form of bulk polymer fi lms by using thermal or photo-initiated polymerization in the presence of template molecules. [ 11,12 ] However, this approach provides only limited density of accessible binding sites in close proximity to the outer surface of the MIP layer, which impedes the sensor sensitivity. In order to provide a more open structure, which can carry higher amounts of binding sites that are available for capture of diffusing target analyte, there were investigated MIP fi lms, which were structured by using sacrifi cial colloidal crystals [ 9,13 ] and optical lithography [ 12 ] or formed by imprinting of loosely crosslinked hydrogels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11,12 ] However, this approach provides only limited density of accessible binding sites in close proximity to the outer surface of the MIP layer, which impedes the sensor sensitivity. In order to provide a more open structure, which can carry higher amounts of binding sites that are available for capture of diffusing target analyte, there were investigated MIP fi lms, which were structured by using sacrifi cial colloidal crystals [ 9,13 ] and optical lithography [ 12 ] or formed by imprinting of loosely crosslinked hydrogels. [ 14 ] These systems were reported to be capable of direct detection of small molecular analytes at typically μM-mM concentrations; [ 3 ] however, several works reported the limit of detection at as low as pM concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target analytes will be separated from coexisting substances and selectively adsorbed on the MIPs materials, followed by detection [19]. Because of its attractive selectivity, high mechanical and thermal stability, high adsorption capacity, as well as low cost and easy operation, MIPs have received extensive concerns and been widely applied in many fields, such as extraction separation [20,21], removal [22] and chemo/biosensors [23,24]. A number of studies for amino acids based on MIPs have been rapidly carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%