1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02847465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photon interaction cross-sections and anomalous scattering factors of Cu and Ag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Puttaswamy et al [33] (diamonds), Sandiago and Gowds [3] (triangles) and Visweswara et al [34] (squares). The tabulation from Henke, which is a synthesis between the theoretical input from [29,35] and experimental data, clearly shows significant discrepancies with other theoretical and experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison Between Theory and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Puttaswamy et al [33] (diamonds), Sandiago and Gowds [3] (triangles) and Visweswara et al [34] (squares). The tabulation from Henke, which is a synthesis between the theoretical input from [29,35] and experimental data, clearly shows significant discrepancies with other theoretical and experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison Between Theory and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Semiempirical tabulation of Henke et al [31] (dotted-dashed line) are available up to 30 keV. Other experimental data include those from Machali et al [32] (asterisks), Puttaswamy et al [33] (diamonds), Sandiago and Gowds [3] (triangles) and Visweswara et al [34] (squares). [32] (asterisks), Figure 11.…”
Section: Summary Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of this work with two theories and other experimental measurements. This work is represented by diamonds, Sandiago & Gowa (1997) by circles, Tajuddin et al (1995 by triangles and Tran et al (2005) by squares. Two theoretical values FFAST and XCOM are represented by solid and dotted lines.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between[14] and earlier measurements[20,10,21,17] for copper. Data are compared to theory[3uncertainty given by the region between dashed lines, which increases to 20% near the K-edge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%