7th Joint MMM-Intermag Conference. Abstracts (Cat. No.98CH36275) 1998
DOI: 10.1109/intmag.1998.742668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoemission Study of the Quantum Well Interference in Magnetic Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, photoemission spectroscopy has provided the most direct observation of the QW states, both bound and resonance states, below the Fermi level. 11 Photoemission spectroscopy measurements have revealed that the QW states can cause dramatic quantum size effects on the film properties, such as film stability, 12 magnetic interlayer coupling, 13 and superconductivity. 14 The QW states at discrete energy levels produce peaks in the photoemission energy spectrum.…”
Section: Microscopic Thickness Determination Of Thin Graphite Films F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, photoemission spectroscopy has provided the most direct observation of the QW states, both bound and resonance states, below the Fermi level. 11 Photoemission spectroscopy measurements have revealed that the QW states can cause dramatic quantum size effects on the film properties, such as film stability, 12 magnetic interlayer coupling, 13 and superconductivity. 14 The QW states at discrete energy levels produce peaks in the photoemission energy spectrum.…”
Section: Microscopic Thickness Determination Of Thin Graphite Films F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k e ⊥ = k BZ − k ⊥ , k BZ = π/a (the Brillouin-zone (BZ) vector), and ν = m − n is the new index. Equations ( 1) and ( 2) are identical for d Cu = ma but k e ⊥ now decreases with energy as observed in experiment [15]. The quantization condition selects discrete k e ⊥ values for a given Cu thickness, which satisfies k e ⊥ = (2πν + φ)/2d Cu , where φ = φ C + φ B .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The physical origin of the coupling effect has been attributed to quantum interferences due to spin-dependent reflections at the spacer boundaries [2][3][4] . The quantum well state (QWS) nature of the interlayer coupling in metallic systems was experimentally confirmed by magnetic measurements 5,6 and photoemission experiments 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%