2014
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodynamic antimicrobial effect of safranine O on an ex vivo periodontal biofilm

Abstract: The results show that oral-pathogenic species in planktonic solution can be suppressed significantly by aPDT with safranine O. Especially for bacteria in a 24-hour ex vivo biofilm, this method is more effective than treatment with 0.2% CHX. Both antibacterial treatments did not show any significant effect on the biofilm cultivated for 72 hours.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, PDT has been used as an alternative therapy for treatment of several pathologies, such as skin cancer [41], Cutaneous leishmaniasis [42], candidiasis [43], tooth decay [44] and periodontitis [45]. …”
Section: Application Of Pdt In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, PDT has been used as an alternative therapy for treatment of several pathologies, such as skin cancer [41], Cutaneous leishmaniasis [42], candidiasis [43], tooth decay [44] and periodontitis [45]. …”
Section: Application Of Pdt In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recently Voos et al (2014) examined Safranine O (3,7-diamino-2,8-dimethyl-5-phenyl-phenazinium chloride), a structure analog to classical phenothiazinium dyes, where a nitrogen atom replaces the sulfur atom, which centers the delocalized electron system, for aPDT against biofilms. In this study, ex vivo biofilms were cultured from subgingival plaque samples for 24 or 72 h. After the respective incubation period the biofilms were incubated with Safranine O (10 μ M) for 15 min followed by irradiation with a diode laser (0.5 W; 532 nm) for 40 or 100 s, applying light doses of 20 or 50 J/cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Apdt Against Biofilms In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 24 h old biofilms there was a reduction of 2 log 10 steps with a light dose of 20 J/cm 2 and 3 log 10 steps with 50 J/cm 2 , whereas treatment with CHX (0.2%; 3 min) generated a reduction by 1 log 10 step only. In contrast, in 72 h old biofilms neither aPDT nor treatment with CHX led to any antibacterial effect (Voos et al, 2014). (Please find a summary of all studies described in this section in Table 1).…”
Section: Apdt Against Biofilms In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this might cause unwanted side effects and possible antibiotic resistance. In addition, it is not easy to have an effective dose for the topical agents used to remove the biofilm [3,4,5]. These difficulties demonstrate that there was a strong need to develop alternative techniques to mitigate these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%