2004
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.70.022713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodetachment of the outer shell ofCin the ground state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between calculation and experiment is excellent over the whole range of energy covered by the experiment. The overall agreement with the results by Zhou et al [7] is also very good. The main difference is in the region just above the first photodetachment threshold where our values for the total cross section, experimental and theoretical, increase monotonically, without the narrow peak due to a slightly larger contribution from the C(1s 2 2s 2 2p 2 3 P ) + e − (ℓ = 0) channel in the calculations of [7].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The agreement between calculation and experiment is excellent over the whole range of energy covered by the experiment. The overall agreement with the results by Zhou et al [7] is also very good. The main difference is in the region just above the first photodetachment threshold where our values for the total cross section, experimental and theoretical, increase monotonically, without the narrow peak due to a slightly larger contribution from the C(1s 2 2s 2 2p 2 3 P ) + e − (ℓ = 0) channel in the calculations of [7].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…In Fig. 4, the current absolute cross sections for photodetachment of C − ( 4 S o ) are compared with the results of our R-matrix calculation and those by Zhou et al [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our current capabilities using this frozen core approximation, as opposed to, for example, the more rigorous Rmatrix approach [16,17] used by more established practitioners in the photodetachment field (e.g. [18]), is appropriate in this Ce − case for several reasons. The most practical issue is the size of the final state calculation.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III). Since we are comparing our results with experimental LPES measurements [10] where the incident photon energy is fixed, rather than the variable photon energy of the laser photodetachment threshold (LPT) method, concerns regarding the possible narrow resonance features present in calculations over a wide range of photon energies [18] are also less immediate. Finally, we consider that our stated goal of these calculations is to determine the dominant photodetachment channels and identify them with the features of the experimental [10] kinetic energy spectrum.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%