2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocount statistics of ultra-weak photon emission from germinating mung bean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the Fano factor in model and experimental data from mungs ( Fig 6c and 6d ) is caused by the fact that the experimental data are composed from the chemiluminescence signal and non-Poisson detector noise while the model data are not. If the SNR is low, the non-Poisson detector noise depreciates the final signal and its distribution, as we recently demonstrated [ 26 ]. Although the Fano factor of experimental mungs data after detrending and the PP method is slightly higher than 1 (specifically, it is 1.17), the chi-square two-sample test confirms the hypothesis of a Poisson distribution (summarized in the section Quality of Poisson pre-processing).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between the Fano factor in model and experimental data from mungs ( Fig 6c and 6d ) is caused by the fact that the experimental data are composed from the chemiluminescence signal and non-Poisson detector noise while the model data are not. If the SNR is low, the non-Poisson detector noise depreciates the final signal and its distribution, as we recently demonstrated [ 26 ]. Although the Fano factor of experimental mungs data after detrending and the PP method is slightly higher than 1 (specifically, it is 1.17), the chi-square two-sample test confirms the hypothesis of a Poisson distribution (summarized in the section Quality of Poisson pre-processing).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The null hypothesis is not rejected for the stationary luminescence experimental data and model data from mung seeds before and after application of the PP method (p-values typically higher than 0.8). The null hypothesis is rejected for detector noise (which is known to be super-Poissonian [ 26 ]) before and after application of the PP method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This light phenomenon differs from a rather bright bioluminescence which is dependent a specific enzymatic complexes which are present only in very specific species such as fireflies and selected jellyfish. What differentiates the general biological autoluminescence from ordinary bioluminescence is, apart the weaker intensity, its ubiquity across biological species ranging from microorganisms [2][3][4][5] through tissue cultures [6][7][8], plants [9][10][11][12][13] up to animals [14] including human [15][16][17]. There are also various synonyma used in the literature describing this light phenomenon such as ultra-weak photon emission [18], ultra-weak bioluminescence [19], endogenous biological chemiluminescence [20], biophotons [21][22][23], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dynamics of EBC during seed germination have not been yet explored in A. thaliana . So far, past reports explored EBC during germination in agriculturally relevant plants such as wheat 15 , 16 , rice 17 and mung beans 18 , 19 . To fill in the gap, we report in this paper on A. thaliana EBC during seed germination and also analyze an effect of externally induced oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%