1999
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorylation/Dephosphorylation of Androgen Receptor as a Determinant of Androgen Agonistic or Antagonistic Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a biphasic dose-response curve was observed with maximal expression of luciferase at 100 nM DHT and lower than maximal expression observed at DHT concentrations greater than 100 nM. This dose-response curve is consistent with results obtained by others for the regulation of androgen-dependent protein expression in LNCaP cells in culture [44][45][46] (but see Pang et al 29 ). Western blot analysis indicated that more TRPL protein is expressed under the control of the relatively strong CMV promoter than under the control of the PSAEn/ PSAPr prostate cell-specific promoter construct.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, a biphasic dose-response curve was observed with maximal expression of luciferase at 100 nM DHT and lower than maximal expression observed at DHT concentrations greater than 100 nM. This dose-response curve is consistent with results obtained by others for the regulation of androgen-dependent protein expression in LNCaP cells in culture [44][45][46] (but see Pang et al 29 ). Western blot analysis indicated that more TRPL protein is expressed under the control of the relatively strong CMV promoter than under the control of the PSAEn/ PSAPr prostate cell-specific promoter construct.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, it is conceivable that AR is brought to the proximity of a preformed activation complex for further biochemical interaction via caveolin-1 association. Because AR is a phosphoprotein with dynamic regulation of its phosphorylation status (41,42), many signal pathways regulated through the caveolin complex are also implicated in AR transactivation process, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (43) and epidermal growth factor receptor (44). It is reasonable to predict, although it remains to be proven, that AR-caveolin interaction may facilitate at least part of the AR phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drug exerts an inhibitory effect on prostate cell proliferation by blocking androgen action, as well as on bone formation and spermatogenesis [32][33][34]. Interestingly, flutamide has been reported to behave as an AR agonist in human prostate cancer tissue with an AR gene mutation and in human LNCaP cells [14][15][16]18]. The agonist-like response was observed at the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) expression or cell growth and has important implications for the treatment of prostate cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas PC3 cells are androgen-insensitive and have lost AR expression, LNCaP cells overexpress a mutated AR and represent cells that have adapted the AR pathway to be able to grow and survive in patients treated with hormone therapy [35,36]. It has been reported that flutamide can behave as an agonist on AR phosphorylation (i.e., activation), resulting in increased PSA expression in LNCaP cells [18]. This feature is closely related to our results with the same cell line cultured with CSS (to deprive the cells of androgens, other steroids and, in all likelihood, some growth factors) since flutamide augmented the expression of PKCb1 isoenzyme in contrast as CSS did.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation