2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus removal enhancement of magnesium modified constructed wetland microcosm and its mechanism study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, different researches report that plant uptake is not a sustainable mechanism of elimination of P-PO 4 [67], and that the main mechanism is the adsorption of this compound on substrates [68], our study shows that vegetation could play an important role in reduction of P-PO 4 in tropical places. However, it is important to evaluate the combination of support media used in this study (RVG and PET) with others that have a greater capacity to remove P-PO 4 [69], such as zeolite [70], and magnesium-containing materials [71]. Regarding the type of substrate, significant differences were observed between both substrates using vegetation (p = 0.001).…”
Section: P-pomentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although, different researches report that plant uptake is not a sustainable mechanism of elimination of P-PO 4 [67], and that the main mechanism is the adsorption of this compound on substrates [68], our study shows that vegetation could play an important role in reduction of P-PO 4 in tropical places. However, it is important to evaluate the combination of support media used in this study (RVG and PET) with others that have a greater capacity to remove P-PO 4 [69], such as zeolite [70], and magnesium-containing materials [71]. Regarding the type of substrate, significant differences were observed between both substrates using vegetation (p = 0.001).…”
Section: P-pomentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This value decreased significantly (p = 0.001) in CWs with vegetation 7.74 ± 0.11mg/L and 6.69 ± 0.15 mg/L in PET and PRS respectively (Figure 3c,d), compared to the systems without plants (9.18 ± 012 mg/L in PET and 8.92 ± 0.25 mg/L in PRS), which could be due to the absorption of PO 4 -P ion by plants for growing development [44], as shown in Figure 2. This behavior is explainable given the main phosphorus removal mechanisms in wetlands (by substrate adsorption and assimilation by plants [45]. However, these values do not comply with the Mexican standard which specifies phosphorus as total phosphorus (PT) and establishes a maximum allowable limit of 5 mg/L.…”
Section: Contaminants Concentration In Influents and Effluents From Cwsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The coexistence of aerobic and anoxic metabolic activities in the same biomass ecosystem for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) also make biofilm technologies attractive [10]. Meanwhile, constructed wetlands (CWs) are also considered a promising water purification technology for treated sewage effluents since they have a low-energy consumption, are environmentally friendly, and have low construction and operation costs [11]. Wetland sediments provide suitable habitats for microbial communities that are associated with the biogeochemical nitrogen removal cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%