2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphodiesterase inhibition and modulation of corticostriatal and hippocampal circuits: Clinical overview and translational considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 266 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimulation of D2 receptors inhibits cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, while phosphodiesterase inhibitors have an opposing effect by preventing cAMP breakdown. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors may therefore have the potential to block the downstream effects of excessive D2 signalling, and also the potential benefit of boosting cortical D1 signalling. Although clinical trials testing these compounds have not yet been successful, there is a significant variability in the regional expression of phosphodiesterase inhibitor subtypes, and those showing the greatest cortical expression remain to be tested.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation of D2 receptors inhibits cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, while phosphodiesterase inhibitors have an opposing effect by preventing cAMP breakdown. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors may therefore have the potential to block the downstream effects of excessive D2 signalling, and also the potential benefit of boosting cortical D1 signalling. Although clinical trials testing these compounds have not yet been successful, there is a significant variability in the regional expression of phosphodiesterase inhibitor subtypes, and those showing the greatest cortical expression remain to be tested.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important posttranscriptional modification is the phosphorylation of the amino acid residue Ser133 in the KID domain (Guo et al, 2017). This domain contains multiple phosphorylation sites for many canonical signaling pathways, such as Ras/Raf/MAPK/p90RSK, Ca 2+ /CaMK, PI3K/Akt/GSK3β, and cAMP/PKA pathways (Tang et al, 2014; Cheng et al, 2016; Xi et al, 2016; Zeng et al, 2016; Heckman et al, 2018), which, upon activation, lead to CREB’s antagonistic effects ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Molecular Structure Of Crebmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that cAMP, through PKA, stimulates the phosphorylation of CREB at Ser133 and causes the activation of CREB (Herold et al, 2011; Heckman et al, 2018), while cGMP activates the downstream protein cGMP-dependent protein kinase G (PKG), which also phosphorylates the transcription factor CREB at Ser133 (Lueptow et al, 2016). This dual phosphorylation by PKA and PKG may amplify the CREB activity (Lu et al, 1999).…”
Section: Molecular Structure Of Crebmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDEs are important negative regulators of PKA activity. Regulation of the striatal expression of PDEs has been reported in PD patients and animal models of PD, particularly a down-regulation of PDE4 and PDE10 (Heckman et al, 2018;Niccolini et al, 2015Niccolini et al, , 2017. Hence, we tested if PDE activity could be implicated in the cell type-specific upregulation of PKA activity observed after DA denervation.…”
Section: -Cell Type-specific Decrease In Pde Activity Contributes To mentioning
confidence: 96%