2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphate sorption and desorption by Thai upland soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(81 reference statements)
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most sorbed P has been retained by the soil which reflects the irreversible sorption of phosphate by soil constituents due to a shift in the form of P held at the surface from a loosely bound to a more tightly bound type. Mechanisms proposed for this process have included precipitation of discrete phosphate minerals (Van Riemsdijk et al 1984;Dubus and Becquer 2001), a shift from monodentate to bidentate forms of sorbed P (Gimsing et al 2007;Wisawapipat et al 2009), and diffusive penetration of surface-sorbed P into soil components (Pierzynski 1991). There was no significant difference (r=−0.589, p=0.296) between P desorbed (initial P concentration of 100 mg l −1 ) and the duration of rice cultivation.…”
Section: Phosphorus Desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most sorbed P has been retained by the soil which reflects the irreversible sorption of phosphate by soil constituents due to a shift in the form of P held at the surface from a loosely bound to a more tightly bound type. Mechanisms proposed for this process have included precipitation of discrete phosphate minerals (Van Riemsdijk et al 1984;Dubus and Becquer 2001), a shift from monodentate to bidentate forms of sorbed P (Gimsing et al 2007;Wisawapipat et al 2009), and diffusive penetration of surface-sorbed P into soil components (Pierzynski 1991). There was no significant difference (r=−0.589, p=0.296) between P desorbed (initial P concentration of 100 mg l −1 ) and the duration of rice cultivation.…”
Section: Phosphorus Desorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mineralogia influencia a disponibilidade de nutrientes no solo e, em alguns casos, sobrepõe o efeito da textura, como observado por Moreira et al (2006), onde as maiores adsorções de P não ocorreram em solos com maior teor de argila e sim naqueles que apresentaram maior teor de Fe total e óxidos de Fe amorfo, o que interfere na disponibilidade desse nutriente para as plantas. Há trabalhos que também apresentaram a preponderância da mineralogia da fração argila na adsorção e disponibilidade de P no solo, como os de Farias et al (2009), Wisawapipat et al (2009) e Pinto et al (2013). Da mesma forma que a disponibilidade de ânions é dependente das cargas superficiais das argilas e, por sua vez da mineralogia, essa também influencia a CTC e a disponibilidade de nutrientes catiônicos no solo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Fe/Al (oxy)hydroxides, especially the less crystalline forms, adsorb more As per unit mass than several clay minerals (Goldberg 2002). However, the Fe/Al (oxy)hydroxide contents in sediments are lower than the clay mineral contents (Wisawapipat et al 2009), so that the adsorption capacity of sediments must be mainly determined by the number of reactive surface groups that clay minerals expose. During the last few years, a relative large number of studies were performed investigating the arsenate adsorption onto clay minerals such as montmorillonite, kaolinite and illite (Manning and Goldberg 1996;Goldberg 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%