2002
DOI: 10.1080/02687040143000483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, orthographic and phonological cues can, in many cases, be an``initiator'' of the naming act, especially when the deficit occurs at the articulatory level (Nickels, 1997). In MRP's case the use of written cueing was useful in improving word production, as has been shown in other cases (see Best et al, 2002;Nickels, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, orthographic and phonological cues can, in many cases, be an``initiator'' of the naming act, especially when the deficit occurs at the articulatory level (Nickels, 1997). In MRP's case the use of written cueing was useful in improving word production, as has been shown in other cases (see Best et al, 2002;Nickels, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recently, Herbert, Best, Hickin, Howard, and Osborne (2001) in a preliminary report, and Best et al (2002) have included the use of written cues in the treatment of a group of patients for whom word-finding difficulties formed``a significant aspect of their aphasia'' (Best et al, 2002, p.154). They found that cueing (using repetition CVC, rhyme VC, spoken CV, or written cues) had a significant effect on the immediate naming ability of 11 aphasic patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diagnostic therapy approaches have been discussed by various authors (e.g., Byng, Kay, Edmundson, & Scott, 1990). Best, Herbert, Hickin, Osborne, and Howard (2002), for example, in a small group study of facilitation in aphasia, found that in pre-therapy trials participants did not respond to cueing methods in the same ways, and that this was possibly, but not necessarily, predictably dependent on the type of aphasic impairment. While it could be argued that applying flexible approaches to the process of enacting aphasia language therapy might make group studies or replications in the conventional sense problematic, Robson and Horton (2007) argue that, as in the group study of writing therapy for people with jargon aphasia (Robson, Marshall, Chiat, & Pring, 2001), therapy may be defined in terms of ''processing goals'', i.e., the nature of the processing the therapy is intended to promote.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As per previous research, for data pertaining to naming accuracy, only items that were named incorrectly during the baseline sessions were included in the analyses (e.g., Best et al, 2002;Howard et al, 1985b;Miceli et al, 1996). An a level of .05 was used for all analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%