2002
DOI: 10.1075/sll.5.1.09cra
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been a range of research on phonological and phonetic aspects of sign language (Crasborn, 2001;Sandler, 1989;Sandler & Lillo-Martin, 2006;Schembri, et al, 2009;Tyrone & Mauk, 2010), starting with Stokoe (2005Stokoe ( ) in 1960 proposing that signs in sign languages consist of three main parameters (handshape, location and movement). However, hardly any studies have looked at sign language from the perspective of efficient language use.…”
Section: Reduction In Visual Repeated References: Gesture and Sign Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a range of research on phonological and phonetic aspects of sign language (Crasborn, 2001;Sandler, 1989;Sandler & Lillo-Martin, 2006;Schembri, et al, 2009;Tyrone & Mauk, 2010), starting with Stokoe (2005Stokoe ( ) in 1960 proposing that signs in sign languages consist of three main parameters (handshape, location and movement). However, hardly any studies have looked at sign language from the perspective of efficient language use.…”
Section: Reduction In Visual Repeated References: Gesture and Sign Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, it has proven difficult to find statistical information on urban sign languages for comparison. In the case of the Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT) it is estimated that hearing signers constitute approximately one third of the total number of sign language users (Commissie Nederlandse Gebarentaal, 1997 cited by Crasborn 2001). Although this number may vary from one urban signing community to the next, it is inevitable that the number will be considerably lower than the 96% of hearing signers reported in the case of Kata Kolok.…”
Section: Table 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'splash'. But additionally in signs like FIRE the two movement components are packed together so that they show partial or total overlap (Brentari, 1998;Crasborn, 2001). …”
Section: Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%