1976
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(76)90014-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonemes, derivational constraints or what?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… A reviewer points out that some linguists and speech scientists question the validity of linguistic constructs like segments and phonemes (see Linell 1976; Faber 1992; Port 2006, 2007), although an exploration of this issue is beyond the scope of this review. In addition, Keating’s description of assimilation in terms of ‘segments’ is somewhat problematic when applied to sign language, which is why I have used the more general term ‘item’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A reviewer points out that some linguists and speech scientists question the validity of linguistic constructs like segments and phonemes (see Linell 1976; Faber 1992; Port 2006, 2007), although an exploration of this issue is beyond the scope of this review. In addition, Keating’s description of assimilation in terms of ‘segments’ is somewhat problematic when applied to sign language, which is why I have used the more general term ‘item’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%