2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00205.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐Distance Coarticulation in Spoken and Signed Language: An Overview

Abstract: This study explores the phenomenon of coarticulation in spoken and signed language, focusing in particular on long-distance effects, defined here as the articulatory influence of one phonetic element on another across at least one intervening segment. While a great deal of variability has been found among language users in the production and perception of such effects, the fact that longdistance coarticulation occurs at all has important theoretical implications. Recent work on sign language, together with rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such long-distant assimilation can be either left to right or right to left. Related to the right-to-left harmony is the long-distance anticipatory vowel to vowel assimilation across more than one syllable reported for English, which is referred to as a form of coarticulation (Magen, 1997;Grosvald, 2010). Both kinds of long-distance assimilation seem incompatible with either target approximation or TD/AP, as it would mean that the approximation of a single vowel target can occur across multiple target approximation movements of the intervening consonants and vowels.…”
Section: Unresolved Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such long-distant assimilation can be either left to right or right to left. Related to the right-to-left harmony is the long-distance anticipatory vowel to vowel assimilation across more than one syllable reported for English, which is referred to as a form of coarticulation (Magen, 1997;Grosvald, 2010). Both kinds of long-distance assimilation seem incompatible with either target approximation or TD/AP, as it would mean that the approximation of a single vowel target can occur across multiple target approximation movements of the intervening consonants and vowels.…”
Section: Unresolved Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If representation were at an entirely segmental or syllabic level, one would not expect to find long-range dependencies. However, production studies (see review by Grosvald, 2010) have found evidence of anticipatory coarticulation between segments within a single word separated by as many as six segments. Perception studies similarly show that listeners are sensitive to this coarticulation, and may use it to facilitate the perception of subsequent speech sounds (Martin & Bunnell, 1982; Beddor et al, 2002).…”
Section: Distributed Versus Local Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-target articulator behavior is important, for example, in studies investigating error patterns, as they arise from articulators that should not be activated, or coproduction, in which non-target articulators are activated during an onset consonant because of a following vowel (Fowler and Saltzman, 1993). Moreover, target and non-target articulatory influences can stretch over longer distances than neighboring speech segments (Grosvald, 2010). Little is known about how non-target activations, especially, are controlled over longer distances and if a target constriction in one word influences the non-target position in the following word.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%