Speech Technologies 2011
DOI: 10.5772/17600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phoneme Recognition on the TIMIT Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
46
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It would appear that higher results will not be achieved for the TIMIT corpus unless other approaches are used, which should include a widening of the phonetic context as was successfully done in [6]. Milestones in phone recognition using the TIMIT database can be found in [30].…”
Section: Contextualizing With Timit State-of-art Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would appear that higher results will not be achieved for the TIMIT corpus unless other approaches are used, which should include a widening of the phonetic context as was successfully done in [6]. Milestones in phone recognition using the TIMIT database can be found in [30].…”
Section: Contextualizing With Timit State-of-art Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This database is often used in phone recognition benchmarking, e.g. [5,7,30]. The train and test sets correspond to the original splitting of the TIMIT database.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "TIMIT recipe" contained in the Kaldi distribution 2 reproduces exactly the same evaluation settings described in (Lopes and Perdigao, 2011) for a phone recognition task based on this corpus. Moreover, Kaldi provides some n-best rescoring scripts that apply RNNLM hypothesis rescoring and interpolate the results with the standard N-gram model results used in the evaluation.…”
Section: Extrinsic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the speech community, the TIMIT corpus is the base for a standard phone-recognition task with specific evaluation procedures described in detail in (Lopes and Perdigao, 2011). We stick completely to this evaluation to test the effectiveness of our proposed model adopting, among the other procedures, the same splitting between the different data sets: the training set contains 3696 utterances (140225 phones), the validation set 400 utterances (15057 phones) and the test set 192 utterances (7215 phones).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-language forced alignment system uses a phone recogniser with a 21.5% phone error rate on the TIMIT corpus, so it is still fairly close to state-of-the-art (Schwarz, 2009, p46;Lopes and Perdigao, 2011). The artificial neural network uses a 310 ms window so it is implicitly context dependent (Schwarz, 2009, p39).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%