1980
DOI: 10.2307/1399191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophical Nonegocentrism in Wittgenstein and Candrakirti in Their Treatment of the Private Language Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we see, Wittgenstein's use of 'language-games' (1968 §7, passim) stresses the embeddedness of language in human behaviors and activities and most especially in human interrelationships and so, as Gilligan and Chodorow theorize, shows that the identity of both young boys and young girls is inherently relational. The relational nature of human life in Wittgenstein's work resonates in important ways with the concept of pratityasamutpada in Nagarjuna's (see also Thurman, 1980). This term is usually translated as 'dependent coorigination' or 'dependent co-arising' and makes reference to the interrelatedness or interbeing of all things.…”
Section: The Relational Self In Nagarjuna and Wittgensteinmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As we see, Wittgenstein's use of 'language-games' (1968 §7, passim) stresses the embeddedness of language in human behaviors and activities and most especially in human interrelationships and so, as Gilligan and Chodorow theorize, shows that the identity of both young boys and young girls is inherently relational. The relational nature of human life in Wittgenstein's work resonates in important ways with the concept of pratityasamutpada in Nagarjuna's (see also Thurman, 1980). This term is usually translated as 'dependent coorigination' or 'dependent co-arising' and makes reference to the interrelatedness or interbeing of all things.…”
Section: The Relational Self In Nagarjuna and Wittgensteinmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The problem of theoretical understanding of everyday life has its origins in the works by M. Weber (Weber, 1999), L. Wittgenstein (Thurman, 1980), H.-G. Gadamer (Gadamer, 2004), A. Schütz, M. Heidegger (Heidegger, 2010), where various theoretical and methodological positions are applied to the investigation of the everyday life and routine.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%