2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00631.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophical and Socio‐Cognitive Foundations for Teaching in Higher Education through Collaborative Approaches to Student Learning

Abstract: This paper considers the implications for higher education of recent work on narrative theory, distributed cognition and artificial intelligence. These perspectives are contrasted with the educational implications of Heidegger's ontological phenomenology [being-there and being-aware (Da-sein)] and with the classic and classical foundations of education which Heidegger and Gadamer once criticised. The aim is to prompt discussion of what teaching might become ifpsychological insights (about collective minds let … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, with regard to research questions, previous research has found three basic models of AI in knowledge processing: knowledge representation, knowledge obtaining, and knowledge derivation [3]. Building on that foundation, the 2 Complexity [43] Investigating decentralized theory of artificial intelligence Exploring creative thinking Vattam et al [24] REA Visualization Science education 157 middle school student QE OTH+ Jonassen [45] Introducing an ask system: interactive learning system Magnisalis et al [21] Review of adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: adaptive and intelligent systems Albin-Clark et al [56] ROL GAM Graphic simulation Construction 4 early childhood lectures and many students EXP, SUR PER+ Wong and Looi [59] Exploring swarm intelligence Seni [60] Investigating the relationship between neurosciences and organizational cognition Lin et al [ [65] Book review in terms of importance and limitation of AI in education Williamson et al [33] Discussing the importance of neuroscience in education Munawar et al…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, with regard to research questions, previous research has found three basic models of AI in knowledge processing: knowledge representation, knowledge obtaining, and knowledge derivation [3]. Building on that foundation, the 2 Complexity [43] Investigating decentralized theory of artificial intelligence Exploring creative thinking Vattam et al [24] REA Visualization Science education 157 middle school student QE OTH+ Jonassen [45] Introducing an ask system: interactive learning system Magnisalis et al [21] Review of adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: adaptive and intelligent systems Albin-Clark et al [56] ROL GAM Graphic simulation Construction 4 early childhood lectures and many students EXP, SUR PER+ Wong and Looi [59] Exploring swarm intelligence Seni [60] Investigating the relationship between neurosciences and organizational cognition Lin et al [ [65] Book review in terms of importance and limitation of AI in education Williamson et al [33] Discussing the importance of neuroscience in education Munawar et al…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is prompted educators to provide adaptive scaffolds for diversified learning environments with various types of learners. Different from the feedback system that offers stock responses, the adaptive educational system is a formative and corrective automated system that can adjust itself (target of intervention) to suit individual learners' characteristics, needs, and preferences (pedagogical objective) [43]. Although only three empirical studies were identified in this review, some researchers were very positive to the future promotion of adaptive system in teaching and learning.…”
Section: Adaptive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heidegger and Gadamer attempted to put the history and philosophy back together with method and science: conceding we can indeed know the world rigorously through techne, but we also have to know that we only know that in our world, and that our knowing issues from realms of practice we have chosen to concern ourselves with (Gadamer, 1960(Gadamer, /2004xxxii, names this as 'experience' or 'wirkungsgeschichtliches Bewußtsein historically-effected consciousness ': xv, xxx, xxxii;Gadamer, 1963Gadamer, / 1979 names it 'une manie`re d'affine': 159). Gadamer and Heidegger's theoretical work undermined smug presumptions of the inherent educational worth of the academic-as-Doctor's discipline-based arch-expertise (Gadamer, 1967(Gadamer, /1989(Gadamer, /1992Jones, 2011a).…”
Section: Pointers From Philosophical Reactions To Historicismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And arguably it is from this perspective that newer approaches like EBL have emerged that move away from the more traditional instructionist approaches. Jones (2011) describes the latter as 'catch and toss' models so called because the teacher pitches, the learner catches and in return tosses something back in the way of an assignment or exam paper.…”
Section: What Is Ebl and How Does It Differ From Traditional Instructmentioning
confidence: 99%