2013
DOI: 10.4103/0972-1282.116090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic detection of β-lactamases in enterobacteriaceae using a 12-disk procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 69 carbapenamase producing isolates ,4.34% were with ESBL,with AmpC in 4.34% and with ESBL +AmpC in 10.14%.This has also been reported by others [6,15] .The present study indicates there is high level of co-expression of various resistance mechanisms among the GNB [15] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 69 carbapenamase producing isolates ,4.34% were with ESBL,with AmpC in 4.34% and with ESBL +AmpC in 10.14%.This has also been reported by others [6,15] .The present study indicates there is high level of co-expression of various resistance mechanisms among the GNB [15] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Failure to detect these enzymes has contributed to their uncontrolled spread and sometimes to therapeutic failure [9] . The newer beta lactamases like ESBL, AmpC and carbapenemase has emerged as a cause of antibiotic resistance among the GNB worldwide in the recent years [6] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Undoubtedly this is due in part to the lack of standard guidelines for detecting AmpCβL producing isolates (Laghawe et al, 2012) Overall 132/339 (38.9%) isolates were found to be MβL producers in our study. This is higher in comparison to some studies (Valsan et al, 2013, Wadekar MD. et al, 2013, Vijaya et al, 2014, but correlates well with the study done by Chatterji SS.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Studies done previously had reported an overall prevalence of ESBL varying from 33.86% to 64.8%. (Valsan et al, 2013, Wadekar et al, 2013, Sinha et al, 2008, Vijaya et al, 2014 It is a well known fact that ESβL positive strains often show false susceptibility results on standard disc diffusion method. However, their spread is so extensive that all laboratories should include their detection by means of special tests, along with the routine testing by CLSI recommended methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%