2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic characterization of Cronobacter spp. strains isolated from foods and clinical specimens in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, according to the parameters used, the C. malonaticus ST440 strain produced a weak biofilm on polystyrene plates. These results were similar to the reported by Umeda et al () that evaluated 10 C. malonaticus strains from six different ST, including two ST440 clinical isolates, and also observed that these strains only formed weak biofilms on polystyrene plates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, according to the parameters used, the C. malonaticus ST440 strain produced a weak biofilm on polystyrene plates. These results were similar to the reported by Umeda et al () that evaluated 10 C. malonaticus strains from six different ST, including two ST440 clinical isolates, and also observed that these strains only formed weak biofilms on polystyrene plates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…ID 2646). The species C. malonaticus is more prevalent in adult infections (Forsythe, ) although it has also been associated with serious neonatal infections (Hariri et al ; Umeda et al ). In Brazil, C. malonaticus ST440 strains have already been isolated from two cases of infections in neonates (Umeda et al ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The magnitude of Cronobacter disease in Brazil is unclear, partly because it is not a compulsory notifiable disease. The most recent reported cases occurred in 2013, when C. malonaticus sequence types (ST) 394 and ST440 were responsible for bacteremia in 3 neonates, and the source of contamination was not identified ( 5 , 7 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%