2020
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.200119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypes from cell-free DNA

Abstract: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has the potential to enable non-invasive detection of disease states and progression. Beyond its sequence, cfDNA also represents the nucleosomal landscape of cell(s)-of-origin and captures the dynamics of the epigenome. In this review, we highlight the emergence of cfDNA epigenomic methods that assess disease beyond the scope of mutant tumour genotyping. Detection of tumour mutations is the gold standard for sequencing methods in clinical oncology. However, limitations inherent to mutatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, let us consider the distributions of DNA fragment sizes. Previous studies reported that cancer cfDNA appears to have shorter fragments that are more strongly digested (Snyder et al 2016;Underhill et al 2016;Mouliere et al 2018a;Sun et al 2018;Markus et al 2021;Guo et al 2020;Zukowski et al 2020). Our results do show differences in cfDNA fragment size distributions, most notably for lupus (Fig.…”
Section: Utility and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, let us consider the distributions of DNA fragment sizes. Previous studies reported that cancer cfDNA appears to have shorter fragments that are more strongly digested (Snyder et al 2016;Underhill et al 2016;Mouliere et al 2018a;Sun et al 2018;Markus et al 2021;Guo et al 2020;Zukowski et al 2020). Our results do show differences in cfDNA fragment size distributions, most notably for lupus (Fig.…”
Section: Utility and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…New types of liquid biopsy tests based on nucleosome positioning-inspired analysis of cfDNA are sometimes termed "fragmentomics" and "nucleosomics" (Im et al 2021). Fragmentomics analyses have been focused on the distribution of sizes of cfDNA fragments (Snyder et al 2016;Underhill et al 2016;Mouliere et al 2018a;Sun et al 2018;Markus et al 2021;Guo et al 2020;Zukowski et al 2020) as well as the nucleotide patterns at their cut sites (Chandrananda et al 2015). Sizes of cfDNA fragments reflect the contributions of different biological processes such as apoptosis, necrosis and NETosis.…”
Section: Short-termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, let us consider the distributions of DNA fragment sizes. Previous studies reported that cancer cfDNA appears to have shorter fragments that are more strongly digested (Snyder et al 2016; Underhill et al 2016; Mouliere et al 2018a; Sun et al 2018; Markus et al 2019; Guo et al 2020; Zukowski et al 2020). Our results do show differences in cfDNA fragment size distributions, most notably for lupus (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Utility and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New types of liquid biopsy tests based on nucleosome positioning-inspired analysis of cfDNA are sometimes termed “fragmentomics” and “nucleosomics” (Im et al 2020). Fragmentomics analyses have been focused on the distribution of sizes of cfDNA fragments (Snyder et al 2016; Underhill et al 2016; Mouliere et al 2018a; Sun et al 2018; Markus et al 2019; Guo et al 2020; Zukowski et al 2020) as well as the nucleotide patterns at their cut sites (Chandrananda et al 2015). Sizes of cfDNA fragments reflect the contributions of different biological processes such as apoptosis, necrosis and NETosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction of TFs with DNA is fundamental to gene regulation and distinct cell types are defined by unique TF-binding profiles. It is known that cfDNA fragments in plasma maintain information regarding chromatin dynamics and TF binding (61). Previous approaches have averaged the coverage of short and long cfDNA fragments from 1000s of sites in order to infer binding of a single TF (23,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%