2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotype and TMT-based quantitative proteomics analysis of Brassica napus reveals new insight into chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volcano plot and protein abundance data showed the differential expression of proteins between CK and TM in each group of plants ( Figure 4 A–C and Table 1 ). According to the variance analysis with p < 0.05 and 1.3- or 0.7-fold change, a commonly used stringent parameter setting for TMT-based comparative proteomics [ 36 , 37 , 38 ], in total, 59, 82, and 111 quantified proteins were considered to be upregulated, and 29, 31, and 57 proteins were considered to be downregulated proteins at the protein level by ER stress in Col, L er , and DM plants, respectively ( Figure 4 D–F, Table S1 ). The enrichment of gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that similar biological process (BP) or molecular function (MF) were enriched in Col and L er , in which GO terms related to protein folding and degradation were commonly found ( Figures S2 and S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcano plot and protein abundance data showed the differential expression of proteins between CK and TM in each group of plants ( Figure 4 A–C and Table 1 ). According to the variance analysis with p < 0.05 and 1.3- or 0.7-fold change, a commonly used stringent parameter setting for TMT-based comparative proteomics [ 36 , 37 , 38 ], in total, 59, 82, and 111 quantified proteins were considered to be upregulated, and 29, 31, and 57 proteins were considered to be downregulated proteins at the protein level by ER stress in Col, L er , and DM plants, respectively ( Figure 4 D–F, Table S1 ). The enrichment of gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that similar biological process (BP) or molecular function (MF) were enriched in Col and L er , in which GO terms related to protein folding and degradation were commonly found ( Figures S2 and S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten plants from plot were randomly selected for agronomic traits analysis. The plant height (PH), internode length (IL), internode number (IN), first branch height (FBH), main inflorescence length (MIL), number of effective primary branches (NPB), number of siliques on raceme (NSR), siliques per plant (SPP), length of siliques (LS), seeds per silique (SPS), thousand-seed weight (TSW) and yield per plant (YPP), were measured and counted as previously described [49,50]. Significant differences were determined by Student's t-test using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago).…”
Section: Agronomic Traits Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten plants from plot were randomly selected for agronomic traits analysis. The plant height (PH), internode length (IL), internode number (IN), rst branch height (FBH), main in orescence length (MIL), number of effective primary branches (NPB), number of siliques on raceme (NSR), siliques per plant (SPP), length of siliques (LS), seeds per silique (SPS), thousand-seed weight (TSW) and yield per plant (YPP), were measured and counted as previously described [39,40]. Signi cant differences were determined by Student's t-test using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc, Chicago).…”
Section: Agronomic Traits Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%