2010
DOI: 10.1134/s004060151009003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenology of erosion wear of constructional steels and alloys by liquid particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in this work, we used data available in the literature to improve Heymann's model. Schmitt [13], Seleznev et al [14], Szprengiel et al [15,16], and Bech et al [9] published erosion results with drop impact on metals, rubber and elastomers for drop sizes ranging from 0.1 mm to 3.5 mm and impact velocities ranging from 100 m/s to 224 m/s. Based on these test results, the best representation of the drop size effect was found with a power of 1.5, as seen in Eq.…”
Section: Erosion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this work, we used data available in the literature to improve Heymann's model. Schmitt [13], Seleznev et al [14], Szprengiel et al [15,16], and Bech et al [9] published erosion results with drop impact on metals, rubber and elastomers for drop sizes ranging from 0.1 mm to 3.5 mm and impact velocities ranging from 100 m/s to 224 m/s. Based on these test results, the best representation of the drop size effect was found with a power of 1.5, as seen in Eq.…”
Section: Erosion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to understand the effects of strain hardening induced by impacts on WDE phenomenon. Various erosion test parameters such as droplet size [28,29], impact speed [7,9,30], impact angle [31], initial surface roughness [23,24] and target mechanical properties [9,[32][33][34][35] are known to influence the erosion performance and are studied in the literature. In this work, all parameters known to influence the erosion behavior are kept constant and only the effect of relieving strain accumulation is studied.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this traditional representation of the erosion is lacking of important information about the experimental conditions, eg, the impacting water on the samples per cycle. Therefore, some authors reported the erosion results taking into account the impacting water, eg, Seleznev et al considered the mass of the impacting water on the sample surfaces and Mahdipoor et al the volume of impacting water per unit of area of the sample surface. Although these methods of reporting the erosion clearly improve the method proposed by the ASTM G73 standard test and they allow to compare the results obtained using drops of different sizes, they are still missing other relevant information about the experimental conditions, eg, running time, impingement velocity of drops, speed of sample, impact frequency, etc.…”
Section: Rain Erosion In Blade Leading Edgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this traditional representation of the erosion is lacking of important information about the experimental conditions, eg, the impacting water on the samples per cycle. Therefore, some authors reported the erosion results taking into account the impacting water, eg, Seleznev et al 96 standard test and they allow to compare the results obtained using drops of different sizes, they are still missing other relevant information about the experimental conditions, eg, running time, impingement velocity of drops, speed of sample, impact frequency, etc. Therefore, a further analysis in this direction is encouraged to be carried out due to this fact also helps in the design of the wind turbine blades and how they operate facing light, moderate, and heavy erosion, were defined to carry them out.…”
Section: Variables For Rain Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%