2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-018-0995-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenological Research Fails to Capture the Experience of Nondual Awareness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What most clearly stands out is that the categories of oneness experience associated with changes in fundamental aspects of perception, including space (e.g., “boundlessness”), time (e.g., “timelessness”), self/identity (e.g., “non-separation”), and wholeness (“part of a greater whole”), appear to influence (at level 1) many other OSPs. The fact that these fundamental perceptual categories appear to drive or influence related OSPs is consistent with many descriptions of oneness/non-dual awareness that describe it primarily as a perceptually related shift, for example, in perception ( Adyashanti, 2009 ; Mills et al, 2018 ), perceptual stance ( Krägeloh, 2019 ), or perspective ( de Castro, 2017 ; Schoenberg and Vago, 2019 ), Or more specifically a shift in self-perception ( Brown and Engler, 1980 ; Mills et al, 2018 ), self-perspective ( Hanley et al, 2018 ), or identity ( Paul, 2008 ), for example, where “awareness is viewing the self rather than the self being aware of the experience” ( de Castro, 2017 , p. 3). More generally, this alteration of time, space, and identity/body is commonly seen in altered states of consciousness research ( Tart, 1972 ; Travis and Pearson, 2000 ; Shanon, 2003 ; Vaitl et al, 2005 ; Hunt, 2007 ; Ataria and Neria, 2013 ; de Castro, 2017 ), with evidence of different neural activity ( Berkovich-Ohana et al, 2013 ; Krause, 2018 ; Winter et al, 2020 ; Wittmann, 2020 ) underlying the experiences of timelessness (outside time) and spacelessness (outside space), related to alterations in the sense of the body and experiences of “then” and “there.” Within contextual behavioral science ( Moran et al, 2018 ), self-as-context is defined as “the coming together […] of a cluster of deictic relations (especially I/Here/Now) that enable observation and description from a perspective or point of view [which] enables or facilitates many different experiences, including […] a transcendent sense of self.”…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…What most clearly stands out is that the categories of oneness experience associated with changes in fundamental aspects of perception, including space (e.g., “boundlessness”), time (e.g., “timelessness”), self/identity (e.g., “non-separation”), and wholeness (“part of a greater whole”), appear to influence (at level 1) many other OSPs. The fact that these fundamental perceptual categories appear to drive or influence related OSPs is consistent with many descriptions of oneness/non-dual awareness that describe it primarily as a perceptually related shift, for example, in perception ( Adyashanti, 2009 ; Mills et al, 2018 ), perceptual stance ( Krägeloh, 2019 ), or perspective ( de Castro, 2017 ; Schoenberg and Vago, 2019 ), Or more specifically a shift in self-perception ( Brown and Engler, 1980 ; Mills et al, 2018 ), self-perspective ( Hanley et al, 2018 ), or identity ( Paul, 2008 ), for example, where “awareness is viewing the self rather than the self being aware of the experience” ( de Castro, 2017 , p. 3). More generally, this alteration of time, space, and identity/body is commonly seen in altered states of consciousness research ( Tart, 1972 ; Travis and Pearson, 2000 ; Shanon, 2003 ; Vaitl et al, 2005 ; Hunt, 2007 ; Ataria and Neria, 2013 ; de Castro, 2017 ), with evidence of different neural activity ( Berkovich-Ohana et al, 2013 ; Krause, 2018 ; Winter et al, 2020 ; Wittmann, 2020 ) underlying the experiences of timelessness (outside time) and spacelessness (outside space), related to alterations in the sense of the body and experiences of “then” and “there.” Within contextual behavioral science ( Moran et al, 2018 ), self-as-context is defined as “the coming together […] of a cluster of deictic relations (especially I/Here/Now) that enable observation and description from a perspective or point of view [which] enables or facilitates many different experiences, including […] a transcendent sense of self.”…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Fourth, although inherent to constructivist grounded theory, we as researchers were involved in the construction of this theory based on the interviews. This is our interpretation of the interviews with this group of participants, which could limit generalizations to other groups of participants and researchers (Does et al 2018;Krägeloh 2018).…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nonduality describes a unification between subject and object, such that boundaries between self and world dissolve. This perspective permeates many different religious, mystical, and philosophical traditions, and can be explicitly found in the Hindu schools of Advaita Vedānta and Kashmiri Shaivism, Mahāyāna Buddhism, and Tibetan Bon Dzogchen and implicitly present in Daoist traditions (Blackstone, 2015;Krägeloh, 2018;Wright, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transformation of self differs from the typical everyday experience, which contains varying degrees of separation between ourselves and what we consider the outside world. While nonduality describes a perspective about the relationship between subject-object, fully realizing nonduality, or nondual awareness, is a non-representational and reflexive consciousness in which distinctions between subject and object no longer endure and is spontaneously realized (Josipovic, 2019;Krägeloh, 2018). While phenomenological aspects of nonduality may be realized and described during particular experiences, nondual awareness describes consciousness that is inherently aware of itself (Dunne et al, 2019;Josipovic, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation