2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Nature of Oneness Experience in Meditators Using Collective Intelligence Methods

Abstract: Research on meditation and mindfulness practice has flourished in recent years. While much of this research has focused on well-being outcomes associated with mindfulness practice, less research has focused on how perception of self may change as a result of mindfulness practice, or whether these changes in self-perception may be mechanisms of mindfulness in action. This is somewhat surprising given that mindfulness derives from traditions often described as guiding people to realize and experience the nonsepa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In theoretical and preliminary empirical studies, experiences of a perceived diminishment or dissolution of the boundaries that separate self and world have been defined and measured through an array of largely overlapping constructs, including self-transcendent experience ( Yaden et al, 2017 ), lack of sense of boundaries ( Ataria, 2015 ; Ataria et al, 2015 ), non-dual awareness ( Hanley et al, 2018 ), oneness experience ( Van Lente and Hogan, 2020 ), and selflessness ( Dor-Ziderman et al, 2013 ; Dambrun, 2016 ). Confusingly, in other contexts the identical terms selflessness ( Dambrun and Ricard, 2011 ; Hanley et al, 2017 ) and self-transcendence ( Vago and Silbersweig, 2012 ; Kang, 2019 ) have been used to refer to allocentric forms of identity – a social identity construct about the degree to which other people are included in one’s self-concept.…”
Section: Results: An Evidence (Gap) Map Of Self-related Processes As Mechanisms For Mindfulness-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theoretical and preliminary empirical studies, experiences of a perceived diminishment or dissolution of the boundaries that separate self and world have been defined and measured through an array of largely overlapping constructs, including self-transcendent experience ( Yaden et al, 2017 ), lack of sense of boundaries ( Ataria, 2015 ; Ataria et al, 2015 ), non-dual awareness ( Hanley et al, 2018 ), oneness experience ( Van Lente and Hogan, 2020 ), and selflessness ( Dor-Ziderman et al, 2013 ; Dambrun, 2016 ). Confusingly, in other contexts the identical terms selflessness ( Dambrun and Ricard, 2011 ; Hanley et al, 2017 ) and self-transcendence ( Vago and Silbersweig, 2012 ; Kang, 2019 ) have been used to refer to allocentric forms of identity – a social identity construct about the degree to which other people are included in one’s self-concept.…”
Section: Results: An Evidence (Gap) Map Of Self-related Processes As Mechanisms For Mindfulness-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers were categorised using the paired-comparison method ([ 28 ]; cf. [ 41 ]). The CI facilitation team (Author 1 and Author 2) conducted open coding and category creation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structural meta-analysis of the three models was conducted to understand the relationship between categories of barriers. In order to carry out this analysis, the following scores (i.e., position score, antecedent/succedent score, influence score) were computed to estimate the influence of each category, as per reported process in [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Metzinger 2020;Tang and Holzel 2015;Woods et al 2020). In addition to newly developing methods of assessing participants' experience, neuroscience studies have significantly increased our understanding of consciousness in contemplative and altered state experiences (Ataria et al 2015;Hanley et al 2018;Lente and Hogan 2020;Lutz and Thompson 2003;Petitmengin et al 2019; but see Krageloh ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%