2019
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenological mismatch with trees reduces wildflower carbon budgets

Abstract: Interacting species can respond differently to climate change, causing unexpected consequences. Many understorey wildflowers in deciduous forests leaf out and flower in the spring when light availability is the highest before overstorey canopy closure. Therefore, different phenological responses by understorey and overstorey species to increased spring temperature could have significant ecological implications. Pairing contemporary data with historical observations initiated by Henry David Thoreau (1850s), we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
163
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
19
163
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As environmental changes shift phenology, the effects ripple out across the ecosystem; however, the impacts of changes in phenology are not completely understood and often not incorporated into terrestrial biosphere models (Richardson et al., ; Viskari et al., ). For example, advancing spring phenology in temperate understory wildflowers is well documented (Miller‐Rushing and Primack, ; McDonough MacKenzie et al., ), but the concurrent and more rapid advance of canopy leaf‐out has shrunk the window of understory high light levels in early spring, such that carbon budgets for understory wildflowers are likely now smaller than in the 19th century and are predicted to continue to shrink (Heberling et al., ). In alpine plant communities, shifts in flowering phenology have shuffled coflowering patterns and redistributed floral abundance across the growing season (CaraDonna et al., ).…”
Section: The Phenology Methods Outlined In This Paper Organized By Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As environmental changes shift phenology, the effects ripple out across the ecosystem; however, the impacts of changes in phenology are not completely understood and often not incorporated into terrestrial biosphere models (Richardson et al., ; Viskari et al., ). For example, advancing spring phenology in temperate understory wildflowers is well documented (Miller‐Rushing and Primack, ; McDonough MacKenzie et al., ), but the concurrent and more rapid advance of canopy leaf‐out has shrunk the window of understory high light levels in early spring, such that carbon budgets for understory wildflowers are likely now smaller than in the 19th century and are predicted to continue to shrink (Heberling et al., ). In alpine plant communities, shifts in flowering phenology have shuffled coflowering patterns and redistributed floral abundance across the growing season (CaraDonna et al., ).…”
Section: The Phenology Methods Outlined In This Paper Organized By Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the herbaceous layer of plantations obviously does not intensify moisture depletion in the upper soil layer, which has been confirmed by understory removal experiments in the Loess Plateau [42]. This is because plantations can greatly decrease herbaceous layer growth and diversity by altering the availability of light [43,44]. These opposing effects contribute to inconspicuous differences in the upper layer soil moisture between plantations and the grassland control.…”
Section: Negative Effects Of Afforestation On Vertical Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Of course, sometimes data limitations constrain analysis to only use first or last metrics, especially when comparing with historic data sets (e.g. Heberling et al 2019). However, in many cases ecologists have much more complete data, and should not be limited to using problematic phenological metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%