1998
DOI: 10.1139/x98-037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetleIps typographus(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus,Ceratocystis polonica

Abstract: Changes in phloem phenolic content of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) clones were followed during the first 12 days of the reaction induced by phloem artificial inoculation with Ceratocystis polonica Siem., a bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) associated fungus. The aim was to confirm our previous results concerning the mechanisms of this reaction and the possible predictors of Norway spruce resistance to bark beetles and their associated fungi. The induced reaction was characterized by a slight decrease… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to fungal infection, conifers develop necrotic phloem lesions by impregnating affected tissues with resin, increasing monoterpene levels and changing the composition of phenols in the secondary phloem (Lieutier et al 1996;Novak et al 2014). In various inoculation experiments, resistant and more susceptible spruce clones were shown to differ in the stimulation of metabolic pathways leading to particular phenolic monomers after wounding and fungal attack (Brignolas et al 1995(Brignolas et al , 1998.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response to fungal infection, conifers develop necrotic phloem lesions by impregnating affected tissues with resin, increasing monoterpene levels and changing the composition of phenols in the secondary phloem (Lieutier et al 1996;Novak et al 2014). In various inoculation experiments, resistant and more susceptible spruce clones were shown to differ in the stimulation of metabolic pathways leading to particular phenolic monomers after wounding and fungal attack (Brignolas et al 1995(Brignolas et al , 1998.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees that are more resistant show significantly higher terpene levels following inoculation of E. polonica in the dark coloured zone around the entrance hole penetrated by fungal hyphae (Zhao et al 2011). Concentrations and composition of particular phenols can even predict Norway spruce resistance to inoculation of E. polonica as shown by Brignolas et al (1995Brignolas et al ( , 1998. Interestingly, pre-treatment of spruce trees with this blue-stain fungus can itself enhance defence capacities via the formation of traumatic resin ducts and activation of polyphenolic parenchyma cells (Krokene et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if resistance is chemically based, concentrations of allelochemicals could potentially provide a diagnostic characterization of resistant germplasm. Metabolic profiling can predict levels of plant resistance to insects (Brennan et al, 1992;Brignolas et al, 1998;see Smith, 2005), thereby aiding plant breeders in improving the resistance levels of selected cultivars (Andersson et al, 1980;Hedin et al, 1991). Concentrations of isochlorogenic acid in roots of lettuce, Lactuca sativa L., predict resistance levels to the lettuce root aphid, Pemphigus bursarius L. (Cole, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, the percentage of dead phloem or cambium was also used (Krokene and Solheim, 1998). The same methods have also often been used to compare the resistance level of different trees to the same fungus or the effect of a treatment on tree resistance (Brignolas et al, 1998;Christiansen and Glosli, 1996;Sallé et al, 2008;Solheim et al, 1993, among others) since the critical threshold of inoculation density depends on genetic and environmental factors affecting the trees' level of resistance. Critical thresholds of inoculation density have been determined for various fungi.…”
Section: Definition and Quantification Of Beetle Aggressiveness And Fmentioning
confidence: 99%