2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2023.103842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenelzine-based probes reveal Secernin-3 is involved in thermal nociception

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The speed of chemical proteomics is highly dependent on the manual process of sample preparation ,, and megadata analysis. , While data processing has been greatly accelerated by computational technologies, manual sample preparation remains the major bottleneck of high-throughput chemical proteomics in drug target discovery. Currently, most sample preparation protocols require an exhaustive and systematic series of manual steps that must be carried out by skilled scientists to extract the proteome fraction of interest (e.g., a probe-labeled proteome for chemical proteomics). , For many protocols, sample preparations require days of labor and inflexible hours at the bench due to the inability to break down the steps and the need to maintain consistency. It can take months of repetitive bench work to complete one data set from proteomics samples with a maximum throughput of ∼10 samples/week/scientist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The speed of chemical proteomics is highly dependent on the manual process of sample preparation ,, and megadata analysis. , While data processing has been greatly accelerated by computational technologies, manual sample preparation remains the major bottleneck of high-throughput chemical proteomics in drug target discovery. Currently, most sample preparation protocols require an exhaustive and systematic series of manual steps that must be carried out by skilled scientists to extract the proteome fraction of interest (e.g., a probe-labeled proteome for chemical proteomics). , For many protocols, sample preparations require days of labor and inflexible hours at the bench due to the inability to break down the steps and the need to maintain consistency. It can take months of repetitive bench work to complete one data set from proteomics samples with a maximum throughput of ∼10 samples/week/scientist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has enabled new opportunities for the discovery of protein drug targets, protein modifications, and small-molecule drugs that selectively modulate their functions (Figure ). There are large numbers of chemical libraries available with untapped potential for new discoveries, each with unique reactivities across diverse biological samples (cell lysates, cell cultures or populations, tissues, organs, and whole organisms). Chemical proteomics often employs a variety of preparations for drug target and drug mechanism discovery. ,, Many protocols require multiple operational steps and often share common processing steps. , A short list of common processes includes cell lysis, chemical reactions, purification or fractionation of a proteome of interest (POI), protein denaturation, reduction and alkylation of protein thiols, enzymatic proteolytic digestion of proteins followed by isotopic labeling with chemical tags, and peptide desalting. The speed of chemical proteomics is highly dependent on the manual process of sample preparation ,, and megadata analysis. , While data processing has been greatly accelerated by computational technologies, manual sample preparation remains the major bottleneck of high-throughput chemical proteomics in drug target discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%