2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase transitions of multi-component fuel droplets under sub- and supercritical conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(172 reference statements)
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) are similar to previous experimental [17,38] and numerical [19,56] studies as illustrated in Fig. 4.5.…”
Section: Effect Of the Ambient Temperature And Pressuresupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) are similar to previous experimental [17,38] and numerical [19,56] studies as illustrated in Fig. 4.5.…”
Section: Effect Of the Ambient Temperature And Pressuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect of the variation of the ambient temperature and pressure on single or multicomponent droplet evaporation has been extensively investigated in the literature [19,14,3,25], whereas, in the current study, the main focus is to monitor the methanol ambient concentration effect on the droplet evaporation characteristics at various ambient temperatures and pressures. Accordingly, the impact of the methanol ambient concentration is investigated at a higher ambient temperature and pressure (case 2 in Table 3.1) compared to the reference case condition (case 1 in Table 3.1).…”
Section: Effect Of the Ambient Temperature And Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the evaporation simulations, the multiphase flow field is solved by the pseudopotential CLBM [Eqs. (15) and ( 16)], while the temperature field [Eq. (17)] is solved by the finite difference method.…”
Section: A Hybrid Pseudopotential Clbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations from the classical D 2 -Law have been frequently observed, especially in droplet evaporation experiments in confined space [13] or in numerical simulations, e.g., evaporation of nanosize droplets and/or under supercritical conditions [14,15]. Among others, one reason accounting for the deviation is that the classical D 2 -Law is established for large open systems (L/D 0 1, L is the system size), which is not always the case in laboratory conditions, while simulations are inevitably limited to finite-size systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D 2 -law, proposed in the seminal works of Langmuir 8 and others, 9,10 states that the surface of an evaporating droplet decreases linearly with time, at a rate fixed by the ambient properties. Although deviations from the classical D 2 -law have been observed in some peculiar conditions, e.g., for droplet sizes of the order of the mean vapor's free path, 11 trans-critical evaporation of nano/micro-droplets 12 and multi-component droplets, 13,14 a linear decrease in the droplet surface is usually observed for single-component micro/millimetric droplets. Nonetheless, recent studies on respiratory events 3,4 found that droplet lifetime may increase even 150 times as compared to Wells's estimate; although a linear decrease in the droplet surface could still be observed, the evaporation rate is found to be much lower than that predicted by the D 2 -law.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%