2001
DOI: 10.1109/74.979495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase-only control of antenna sum and shaped patterns through null perturbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this example, we obtain a gap of 30 dB between the side lobes at both sides of the main beam. An improvement of more than 10 dB over the results reported in [9,10] has been noticed. The main beam widths in the original Dolph array and the proposed array patterns are 6.7520 ∘ and 7.26 ∘ , respectively, while the taper efficiency has changed from 96.09% to 86.86%.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this example, we obtain a gap of 30 dB between the side lobes at both sides of the main beam. An improvement of more than 10 dB over the results reported in [9,10] has been noticed. The main beam widths in the original Dolph array and the proposed array patterns are 6.7520 ∘ and 7.26 ∘ , respectively, while the taper efficiency has changed from 96.09% to 86.86%.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The first is fully controlled arrays [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] that require full control of weights of all the array elements, while the second is the partially controlled arrays that require few elements' weight to be controllable [8]. In both groups, it is much easier to control the phase distribution of the element excitations than to control the amplitude distribution [9,10]. To synthesize an array pattern with specific constraints on the side lobe structure, various optimization algorithms have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trivial solution would be amplitude tapering, or, as an extreme case, the use of only a part of the transmit antenna; but this causes a significant loss of radiated power; furthermore, it may lower the overall efficiency since the high-power amplifiers in the T/R modules are no longer driven in saturation. Another solution is phase tapering, but the derivation of appropriate phase coefficients is a complex task that requires, in general, complicated numerical optimization techniques [42], [43].…”
Section: A Limitations Of a Fixed-aperture Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of easily reconfiguring the radiation behavior of a direct-radiating array antenna is crucial in several applications, including radar and satellite telecommunications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Amongst the different kinds of reconfigurability, a very effective one is undoubtedly represented by phase-only control, as it allows both a simplification of the beam forming network and an increase of the amplifiers' efficiency [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the different kinds of reconfigurability, a very effective one is undoubtedly represented by phase-only control, as it allows both a simplification of the beam forming network and an increase of the amplifiers' efficiency [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%