2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/9293031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesizing Asymmetric Side Lobe Pattern with Steered Nulling in Nonuniformly Excited Linear Arrays by Controlling Edge Elements

Abstract: In radar antennas, asymmetric side lobes are useful, where undesired signals such as noise and ground clutter should be minimized. Also, for practical implementation, the feeding network of such antennas should be efficiently designed. In this paper, a simple analytical method for synthesizing asymmetric side lobe pattern with a wide-angle steered null in the nonuniformly excited linear arrays is presented. In this method, the difference in the side lobe levels on both sides of the main beam is achieved by var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing (1) and 2, it is clear that the number of the adjustable weights, w nm , has been reduced from N × M in the fully adaptive planar array to only 2( − 1) + 2( − 1)in the proposed planar array. Unlike the control methods of the two edge elements that were presented in [1], [3], [4], [10] and [11], the proposed planar array has enough degrees of freedom to efficiently accomplish low SLL and null controls as will be shown in the simulation results. The optimization problem is formulated as the determination of the complex weights of the perimeter elements such that the resulting radiation pattern is constrained by one or more of the following:…”
Section: Planar Array With Optimized Perimeter Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing (1) and 2, it is clear that the number of the adjustable weights, w nm , has been reduced from N × M in the fully adaptive planar array to only 2( − 1) + 2( − 1)in the proposed planar array. Unlike the control methods of the two edge elements that were presented in [1], [3], [4], [10] and [11], the proposed planar array has enough degrees of freedom to efficiently accomplish low SLL and null controls as will be shown in the simulation results. The optimization problem is formulated as the determination of the complex weights of the perimeter elements such that the resulting radiation pattern is constrained by one or more of the following:…”
Section: Planar Array With Optimized Perimeter Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One effect of high sidelobes is the inability to detect the targets due to the strong ground clutter and/or high interference environment. In order to suppress these clutter echoes, the array pattern should be designed with low sidelobes or asymmetric sidelobes [1], [2]. However, an increase in the width of the mainlobe is unavoidable as the cost of obtaining low sidelobes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches have utilized few elements at the center of the array to achieve better adaptive responses [16]. The side element idea was also deployed for the synthesis of asymmetrical radiation pattern where it is desirable to highly reduce the sidelobe on one side of the main beam while tolerating a higher sidelobes on the other side [17].…”
Section: And Jafar Ramadhan Mohammedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, consider a large planar array with 40 × 40 elements, where there are 2 1600 possible searching combinations. Thus, simpler techniques with smaller or restricted searching spaces are currently of great research importance in practice [11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%