2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202204601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Engineering and Alkali Cation Stabilization for 1T Molybdenum Dichalcogenides Monolayers

Abstract: The technological barriers of the dimensional engineering and interfacial instability seriously hinder the scalable production of metallic (1T) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) monolayers. In this article, a facile and fast electron injection strategy is developed to modulate the d orbits of Mo center in trigonal prismatic 2H phases (MoS 2 and MoSe 2 ); meanwhile various cations (Li + , Na + , and K + ) reinforce the in-plane 1T-atomic arrangement and expand the out-of-plane spacing for easy exfoliation.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The position of the Mo 3p peaks does not significantly change after the intercalation, indicating that (CTA) x MoS 2 and (TEA) y MoS 2 retain the pristine trigonal prismatic phase (2H). [42][43][44] This is further confirmed by a micro-Raman characterization of the crystals, which shows no traces of the 1T/1T' phase (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Additionally, the width of the Mo peaks in the XPS spectrum of the intercalates is 1.7 times larger than that of the pristine crystal, suggesting that the physicochemical environment of the Mo atoms is not homogeneous across the surface, producing slightly shifted components in the Mo peak that overall result in a larger width.…”
Section: Intercalation Of Mos2 Bulk Crystalssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The position of the Mo 3p peaks does not significantly change after the intercalation, indicating that (CTA) x MoS 2 and (TEA) y MoS 2 retain the pristine trigonal prismatic phase (2H). [42][43][44] This is further confirmed by a micro-Raman characterization of the crystals, which shows no traces of the 1T/1T' phase (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Additionally, the width of the Mo peaks in the XPS spectrum of the intercalates is 1.7 times larger than that of the pristine crystal, suggesting that the physicochemical environment of the Mo atoms is not homogeneous across the surface, producing slightly shifted components in the Mo peak that overall result in a larger width.…”
Section: Intercalation Of Mos2 Bulk Crystalssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…3b), corresponding well with the PXRD results. 34 Material characterization results reveal the high phase purity of the synthesized composites. Meanwhile, the thermal stability of the composites was evaluated through TG analysis conducted from 25 to 800 °C (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Each TMD atomic layer presents a lamellar structure with a transition metal layer molecularly bonded between two chalcogen layers, forming various stacked polytypes including the thermodynamically stable trigonal prismatic coordination (2H), metastable octahedral coordination (1T), and prismatic (3R) phases. 11 Moreover, Mo atomic planes bonded in the metallic 1T phase can be distorted into zigzag chains to form a disordered 1T 0 phase. For the well-studied 2H-MoS 2 , the electroactive sites only locate at the sulfur edges with an armchair or zigzag coordination, while both the edges and most basal planes of metallic 1T/1T 0 -MoS 2 nanosheets are electrochemically active.…”
Section: Classification Of Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In particular, two-dimensional (2D) materials, such as graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), MXene and black phosphorus (BP), have emerged as promising electrode materials for next-generation catalytic/electrochemical systems. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The distinct structural architectures (e.g., planar, buckling, and puckered structures) and ultrahigh specific surface area endow 2D materials with various attractive merits, including short ion transport pathways, low ion diffusion barriers, tunable electronic structures, and large surface interactions. [16][17][18] However, the dimensionality reduction of materials inevitably brings some intrinsic structure and property limitations compared with their bulk electrode counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%