Phase 3 Study of Lenalidomide (LEN) Vs Placebo in Non-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Low Risk Del(5q) MDS Patients - Interim Analysis of the European Sintra-REV Trial

Abstract

Background: Most IPSS low and int1 (lower) risk MDS patients with isolated del(5q) develop RBC TD or need treatment for symptomatic anemia early after diagnosis (median time to transfusion/treatment of 20 months, López Cadenas et al abstract 3180 ASH, 2016). Lenalidomide (LEN) is a reference treatment in MDS-del(5q) but approved in many countries only when RBC-TD occurs. LEN directly targets the del(5q) clone improving anemia and quality of life. Limited data also suggest a role of LEN in non-TD patients with del(5q) (Oliva et al Cancer Med 2015), but no randomized trial has assessed the efficacy and tolerance of early LEN treatment in this MDS subset. Material: The Sintra-Rev clinical trial is a phase III European multicenter study in low-risk MDS-del(5q) patients with anemia (Hb<12g/dL), without TD. Patients were randomized in a double-blind design to LEN (5mg/day continuously) vs placebo (2:1 randomization) for 2 years of treatment and 2y of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the time to TD, secondary endpoints included erythroid (HI-E) and cytogenetic response (CyR) (all according to IWG 2006 criteria), overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), time to AML and mutational analysis (TP53 and other myeloid mutations). Here, we report results of the interim analysis after completion of the treatment phase in all patients (March 2020). Results: Main clinical characteristics of the 61 patients (ITT population) included (Feb-2010 to Feb-2018) are summarized in Table 1: 82% females, median age 72 years (range 37-89), median time since diagnosis 3.6 months, median Hb at inclusion 9.8 g/dL (7.1 - 11.7) g/dL and 93% patients had isolated del(5q). Four patients were excluded due either to screening failure (1 pat) or failure to complete at least 12w of treatment (3 pat). Fifty-seven patients were included in the ITT evaluable population for efficacy and 59 for safety (2 patients did not receive any drug). Median time on treatment was 66 weeks (3-121), 95w in the LEN arm and 42w in the placebo arm (p=0.392). Forty-seven percent patients in the LEN arm successfully completed the study compared to 33% in the placebo arm. After a median follow up of 25.6 months (Q1 16-Q3 39), median OS was not achieved. Among the 57 patients evaluable for efficacy, median time to TD was 75.7 mo for the LEN patients and 25.9 mo for the placebo arm (HR 2.703, 95CI1.162-6.286, p=0.021, figure 1). HI-E response was observed in 72.5% of LEN patients compared to 0% in the placebo arm (p<0.001). Median Hb improvement in responders was 2.8 g/dL. Eighty percent of LEN patients achieved a cytogenetic response (CyR) compared to 4.8% of patients receiving placebo (p<0.001, complete CyR 70% in the LEN arm). OS was similar in both arms (not reached) while EFS was superior in the LEN arm (HR 2.274, 95CI 1.034-5.001, p=0.041). AML evolution was similar in both arms (5%). Mutational analysis will be presented at the meeting. Fifty-eight patients developed at least one adverse event (AE) during the trial (no differences between the LEN and placebo arm), related to the drug 86.8% in the LEN and 33.3% in the placebo arm, respectively (p<0.001). Hematological toxicity occurred in 40 patients in the LEN arm (50% grades 3/4) and only 4 patients in the placebo arm (25% grade 3/4). At least one SAE was seen in 31.6% of the LEN patients compared to 4.8% in the placebo arm (p=0.022), not related to the drug. Nineteen serious AE were reported in 13 patients, 4 of them (2nd neoplasia, pulmonary embolism, febrile neutropenia and blurred vision) potentially related with the study drug, with no related deaths. Conclusions: In this interim analysis we confirm that low dose LEN (5 mg) in anemic non-TD low risk MDS del(5q) patients prolongs the period of time to TD (75.7 mo vs 25.9 mo), improves Hb levels (72.5% of ER) and induces clonal responses (70% complete CyR), ie potentially more responses than in historical series of MDS del(5q) treated with LEN at time of TD, with a manageable safety profile, and no increased progression rate. Longer follow up will be required to assess the effect of early treatment with LEN, and particularly the effect of the early reduction of the del(5q) clone size, on long-term outcomes. Disclosures Hernandez-Rivas: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rovi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Sanz:LaHoffman Roche Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Pharmaceutical Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giagounidis:AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Götze:Celgene: Research Funding. Fenaux:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding. Diez-Campelo:Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: LEN IN ANEMIC BUT NOT TD PATIENTS WITH LOW RISK MDS AND DEL(5Q)

Myelodysplastic syndromes del(5q): Pathogenesis and its therapeutic implications

“…The median duration of dose reduction or interruption were (p = .022), and these events were not related to the drug. 69 In Table 3 data of studies regarding lenalidomide use in del(5q) MDS patients are summarized.…”

“…Hematological toxicity occurred more frequently in lenalidomide arm compared to the placebo arm, with 40 and 4 patients affected, respectively. At least one SAE was observed in 31.6% of the lenalidomide patients compared to 4.8% in the placebo arm ( p = .022), and these events were not related to the drug 69 . In Table 3 data of studies regarding lenalidomide use in del(5q) MDS patients are summarized.…”

Management of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

“…Generally, therapies such as lenalidomide have been reserved for transfusion-dependent patients; however, there are ongoing investigations exploring the possible benefits of starting treatments prior to transfusion dependence. An interim analysis of the phase 3 European Sintra-REV trial comparing lenalidomide to placebo in patients with non-transfusion-dependent del(5q) LR-MDS [ 52 ] showed that the patients receiving lenalidomide had a significantly longer time to transfusion dependence compared with patients receiving placebo (76 vs. 26 months; P = 0.021) [ 52 ]. However, a comparison to ESA would have been more in line with the current European guidelines.…”

Real-world Data From the Swiss Lenalidomide in MDS del(5q) (SLIM)—Registry Identify New Chances and Challenges in Lenalidomide Treatment of Patients With MDS del(5q)

“…Whether this practice will alter the natural course of the disease and has an impact on long‐term outcome is not known, as is the optimal time of starting therapy. However, interim analyses of the SINTRA‐REV trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01243476) in non‐TD LR MDS del(5q) patients suggest that early treatment with lenalidomide at low doses (5 mg) prolongs the time to and decreases the risk of TD with cytogenetic responses 7 . This is supported by our data—although not corrected for disease duration and risk stratification—as patients with no RBC transfusions during the first cycle of treatment with lenalidomide had a significant improvement of median OS ( P = 0.014).…”