2019
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase 3 LILAC study sets standard for clinical evaluation of oncology biosimilars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, clinical safety and efficacy of ABP 980 were demonstrated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, comparative clinical study (LILAC) conducted in patients with early breast cancer (EBC) [ 15 , 16 ]. This patient population is considered to be a sensitive population in which to evaluate a trastuzumab biosimilar because of its homogeneity and minimal confounding factors such as prior treatments that may confound immunogenicity evaluation, line of therapy, disease burden, comorbidities, and risk of secondary cancers [ 17 – 19 ].…”
Section: Totality Of Evidence For Abp 980: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, clinical safety and efficacy of ABP 980 were demonstrated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, comparative clinical study (LILAC) conducted in patients with early breast cancer (EBC) [ 15 , 16 ]. This patient population is considered to be a sensitive population in which to evaluate a trastuzumab biosimilar because of its homogeneity and minimal confounding factors such as prior treatments that may confound immunogenicity evaluation, line of therapy, disease burden, comorbidities, and risk of secondary cancers [ 17 – 19 ].…”
Section: Totality Of Evidence For Abp 980: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 725 patients were randomized in the LILAC study to receive ABP 980 ( n = 364) or trastuzumab RP ( n = 361) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks or 80 mg/m 2 once weekly for 12 cycles if that was the standard of care in that region) followed by surgery. The co-primary efficacy endpoints in this study were risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast tissue and axillary lymph nodes assessed at a local laboratory [ 15 , 16 ]. A central laboratory performed a sensitivity analysis of tumor samples in order to reduce inter-pathologist variability in response determination.…”
Section: Totality Of Evidence For Abp 980: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%