2012
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe76348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacy Preceptors’ Views on the Value and Optimal Frequency of Quality Assurance Visits to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Sites

Abstract: Objective. To determine volunteer preceptors' perceived value and desired frequency of quality assurance visits by experiential education faculty members.Methods. An electronic survey instrument was sent to 235 volunteer preceptors. Results. A 71.5% response rate was achieved. Nearly 90% of respondents indicated that onsite visits met their needs. Approximately 50% of respondents preferred monthly onsite visits, 17% preferred every other month, and 32% preferred once per year. Conclusions. A quality assurance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bergett and colleagues underscored the need to recruit and retain quality advanced pharmacy practice experience sites and preceptors, with onsite faculty visits serving as an ongoing quality assurance measure. 9 In their study, experiential education faculty members made monthly site visits to review student rotation structure and processes and provide guidance to preceptors volunteering in its program. Separate discussions with students and preceptors, and joint meetings when appropriate, were described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergett and colleagues underscored the need to recruit and retain quality advanced pharmacy practice experience sites and preceptors, with onsite faculty visits serving as an ongoing quality assurance measure. 9 In their study, experiential education faculty members made monthly site visits to review student rotation structure and processes and provide guidance to preceptors volunteering in its program. Separate discussions with students and preceptors, and joint meetings when appropriate, were described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also reviewed ACPE Guidelines Version 2.0, research articles, and discussion papers published by experiential program administrators in the past 5 years, stakeholder policy statements, such as the 2010 ACPE Policy Statement on Simulations for IPPEs, list-serv questions of the AACP Pediatric Pharmacy Special Interest Group, AACP annual meeting roundtable topics and presentations, and the 2013 Center for the Advancement of Pharmaceutical Education (CAPE) Outcomes. 2,[4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The new survey questions were reviewed and pilot-tested by three experiential program directors and a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) candidate prior to dissemination. The Institutional Review Board at Butler University approved the method and the web-based survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Approximately 89% of respondents believed that these visits improved communication between the preceptor and the college, and 76.2% of the preceptors believed that the visits should D r a f t continue. In addition to being an asset to their own personal practice and skills, 79.5% believed that the visits are valuable to the students' development.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%