1991
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1991.9694290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of sulphadimidine in carp (Cyprinus carpioL.) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneriRichardson) acclimated at two different temperature levels

Abstract: The influence of temperature (10 degrees C and 20 degrees C) on pharmacokinetics and metabolism of sulphadimidine (SDM) in carp and trout was studied. At 20 degrees C a significantly lower level of distribution (Vdarea) and a significantly shorter elimination half-life (T(1/2)beta) was achieved in both species compared to the 10 degrees C level. In carp the body clearance parameter (ClB(SDM)) was significantly higher at 20 degrees C compared to the value at 10 degrees C, whereas for trout this parameter was in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, at colder acclimation temperatures less metabolites are present and compound t½s are longer. This is consistent with numerous temperature studies examining a variety of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics (Collier et al 1978; Varanasi et al 1981; Salte and Liestol 1983; Kasuga et al 1984; Jacobsen 1989; van Ginneken et al 1991; Bjorklund et al 1992; Kleinow et al 1994). While these in vivo findings suggest that warmer temperatures result in greater biotransformation and subsequent elimination, in vitro studies with membrane-bound systems suggest activity compensation with temperature change.…”
Section: Temperature Alters Xenobiotic Elimination In Fishsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Conversely, at colder acclimation temperatures less metabolites are present and compound t½s are longer. This is consistent with numerous temperature studies examining a variety of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics (Collier et al 1978; Varanasi et al 1981; Salte and Liestol 1983; Kasuga et al 1984; Jacobsen 1989; van Ginneken et al 1991; Bjorklund et al 1992; Kleinow et al 1994). While these in vivo findings suggest that warmer temperatures result in greater biotransformation and subsequent elimination, in vitro studies with membrane-bound systems suggest activity compensation with temperature change.…”
Section: Temperature Alters Xenobiotic Elimination In Fishsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The T max of CFQ in turtles ( 3 hr) was longer than those in tilapia (0.14 and 0.17 hr) after IM and IP administrations of CFQ (10 mg/kg) at 30°C (Shan et al., ), but shorter than that in Coho salmon (12 hr) after IP administration of CFQ (20 mg/kg) at 10°C (San Martín et al., ). Different T max values may be related to differences in cardiac rate and tissue blood flow resulting from species difference and temperature adaptations (Kik & Mitchell, ; Van Ginneken et al., ). The overall MRT was longer for IM injection (31.92 hr) compared with that for IV injection (24.99 hr); this was expected because the disposition and absorption rates after IM injection affect the MRT.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Parameters Of Cfq In Red‐eared Sliders (N = mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFQ is minimally metabolized and excreted predominantly by the kidneys in mammals (CVMP, 1995). Differences in the Cl T and t 1/2λz of CFQ between species are possibly the result of species differences and temperature adaptations, which affect renal clearance rates and the activity of the cardiovascular system (Kik & Mitchell, 2005;Van Ginneken, Nouws, Grondel, Driessens, & Degen, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that in turtles, systemic and pulmonary blood flows decrease during cooling and the heart rate rises up during warming (Galli, Taylor, & Wang, 2004). In reptiles and fish, cardiac output and tissue perfusion rates vary depending on the ambient temperature (Kik & Mitchell, 2005;Van Ginneken, Nouws, Grondel, Driessens, & Degen, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%