1992
DOI: 10.1159/000239001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Cefodizime in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Ascites

Abstract: The pharmacokinetics of cefodizime were studied in 6 healthy male volunteers (group A) and 6 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites (group B) receiving 1 g of the drug as an i.v. bolus. Cefodizime was assayed in serum and ascitic fluid (AF) samples by a microbiological assay. The serum concentration-time curve fitted a two-compartment open model in group A and a three-compartment open model in group B. Initially, the serum level of cefodizime in group A exceeded that in group B for about 10 h; thereafter th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The penetration value was greater with cefepime (0.90 ± 0.10, 16,17 or cefodizime (0.78 ± 0.10, n = 6). 18 In the fi nal population pharmacokinetic model with good predictive performance (Fig. 2), the result that θ Q3 was greater than θ Cl and θ Q2 (Table 4) also indicates a high peritoneal penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The penetration value was greater with cefepime (0.90 ± 0.10, 16,17 or cefodizime (0.78 ± 0.10, n = 6). 18 In the fi nal population pharmacokinetic model with good predictive performance (Fig. 2), the result that θ Q3 was greater than θ Cl and θ Q2 (Table 4) also indicates a high peritoneal penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The amount of unchanged drug, percentage of unchanged drug and renal clearance was 18.3, 18.3 and 8.8%, respectively, of that of healthy controls in participants with impairment, indicating impaired renal function mainly contributed to differences in clearance and exposure. In addition, the majority of participants with impairment had ascites, which may have contributed to a longer t max and t ½ λz [ 32 , 33 ]. These findings demonstrate how concurrent renal and hepatic impairment can impact PK and highlight the importance of investigating the effects of drugs in this patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org/ 10. 1186/ 1472-6904-11-3, licensed under CC BY 2.0 () and published under licence to BioMed Central Ltd. Glomerular filtration rate categories (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) were as follows: G1-normal or high (≥ 90), G2-mildly decreased (60-89), G3a-mildly to moderately decreased (45-59) and G3bmoderately to severely decreased (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). Predictions for the mean CL/F versus baseline eGFR, and associated 95% CIs, used model averaging on a dataset containing data from participants in the renal impairment and the hepatic impairment study (n = 80) (i.e., data available prior to conducting the combined renal and hepatic impairment study) as well as to a dataset containing data from participants in the renal, the hepatic and the combined impairment study (n = 103) (i.e., data available after conducting the combined renal and hepatic impairment study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in agreement with, and extend, those obtained by Dagrosa and coworkers, who investigated the pharmacokinetics of cefodizime in healthy male volunteers after single-dose intravenous administration (dose range, 0.5 to 2.0 g) (4). The linear pharmacokinetics of cefodizime facilitate the prediction of the effects of dosage adjustments, for example, in patients with renal or hepatic impairment (6,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%